[Test-Announce] 2013-10-02 @ 16:00 UTC - F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #2

[Tim Flink]

# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2013-10-02
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

It's almost Wednesday and we all know what that means - time to review
some blocker bugs! We've got a decent number of bugs up for review
tomorrow, so join us and help move this process along!

We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze exception bugs.
The current list is available at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...

1. Whether they meet the beta release criteria [1] and should stay
      on the list
2. Whether they are getting the attention they need

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria

For guidance on Blocker and FreezeException bugs, please refer to
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

For the blocker review meeting protocol, see
  -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

_______________________________________________
test-announce mailing list
test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce

F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #2 Minutes

[Tim Flink]

================================================
#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-2
================================================


Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta...
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta...
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-10-02/f20beta...


Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (tflink, 16:00:25)

* Introduction  (tflink, 16:04:09)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze
    exception bugs.  (tflink, 16:04:14)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (tflink, 16:04:19)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 16:04:19)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (tflink, 16:04:29)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (tflink,
    16:04:29)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (tflink,
    16:04:35)
  * Up for review today, we have:  (tflink, 16:05:06)
  * 9 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 16:05:34)
  * 7 Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 16:05:34)
  * 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:05:34)
  * 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions  (tflink, 16:05:35)

* (1009809) KeyError: 'name'  (tflink, 16:06:44)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009809   (tflink,
    16:06:44)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 16:06:44)
  * AGREED: 1009809 - This still needs testing to see if at least 1 of
    nfs/nfsiso works - will revisit once that testing has been done
    (tflink, 16:10:10)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504   (tflink,
    16:10:16)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 16:10:16)
  * AGREED: 1012504 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for btrfs custom partitions: "When using the
    custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to ... Create
    mount points backed by ext4 partitions, LVM volumes or btrfs volumes
    ..."  (tflink, 16:17:54)

* (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1
  target device  (tflink, 16:18:07)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495   (tflink,
    16:18:10)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST  (tflink, 16:18:13)
  * AGREED: 1010495 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for EFI system partitions on apple hardware:
    "Cleanly install to a disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and
    partition table which contains existing data and sufficient
    unpartitioned space for a Fedora installation"  (tflink, 16:25:03)

* (1013800) devicetree.py:1293:handleVgLvs:DeviceTreeError: failed to
  look up thin pool  (tflink, 16:25:15)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013800   (tflink,
    16:25:18)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:25:21)
  * AGREED: 1013800 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 beta
    release criterion for LVM thinp: "When using the guided partitioning
    flow, the installer must be able to ... Complete an installation
    using any combination of disk configuration options it allows the
    user to select"  (tflink, 16:28:14)

* (1013586) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0  (tflink,
  16:28:39)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013586   (tflink,
    16:28:39)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:28:39)
  * AGREED: 1013586 - We need more information and testing to figure out
    how common this failure mode is. will re-visit once more testing has
    been done.  (tflink, 16:35:03)

* (1012646) anaconda creates grub.cfg lacking an initrd entry, kernel
  panics on reboot  (tflink, 16:35:42)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012646   (tflink,
    16:35:45)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 16:35:47)
  * AGREED: 1012646 - RejectedBlocker - This is a problem but the actual
    bug is in grubby, not anaconda and in this case, anaconda is
    behaving as expected  (tflink, 16:40:26)

* (1013087) selection of rescue kernel causes kernel panic, due to lack
  of initramfs  (tflink, 16:40:43)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013087   (tflink,
    16:40:46)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 16:40:48)
  * AGREED: 1013087 - RejectedBlocker - While unfortunate, this does not
    violate any F20 beta release criteria and thus is rejected as a
    release blocking issue for f20 beta  (tflink, 16:53:10)

* (1013767) rootfs on thinp not found, startup failure  (tflink,
  16:53:35)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013767   (tflink,
    16:53:35)
  * Proposed Blocker, dracut, NEW  (tflink, 16:53:35)
  * AGREED: 1013767 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha
    release criterion for LVM thinp autopart installs: "A system
    installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
    screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a
    user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
    (tflink, 17:06:49)

* (864198) grubby fatal error updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs
  (tflink, 17:06:59)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198   (tflink,
    17:07:02)
  * Proposed Blocker, grubby, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 17:07:05)
  * AGREED: 864198 - RejectedBlocker - This does not clearly violate any
    F20 beta criteria and is a corner case. Therefore, it does not
    qualify as a release blocking bug for f20 beta.  (tflink, 17:39:25)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980221   (adamw,
    17:41:14)

* (1007590) Black screen after F20 graphical install on PPC64  (tflink,
  17:44:05)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007590   (tflink,
    17:44:08)
  * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, glibc, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 17:44:10)
  * AGREED: 1007590 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a showstopper
    for PPC64 and while not PA, a tested fix would be considered past
    freeze.  (tflink, 17:47:29)

* (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB)  (tflink, 17:53:34)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891   (tflink,
    17:53:34)
  * Accepted Blocker, distribution, NEW  (tflink, 17:53:35)
  * ACTION: jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd
    size or find someone to do it  (tflink, 17:59:38)
  * DVD still oversize, needs discussion/changes to get it back under
    4.7 GB  (tflink, 18:00:04)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 18:04:01)
  * next blocker review meeting will be 2013-10-09 @ 16:00 UTC  (tflink,
    18:06:00)

Meeting ended at 18:07:58 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or find
  someone to do it




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jreznik
  * jreznik to start investigating ways to trim down the dvd size or
    find someone to do it
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (240)
* cmurf (181)
* adamw (179)
* Viking-Ice (110)
* kparal (56)
* roshi (37)
* dan408 (37)
* zodbot (11)
* jreznik (10)
* handsome_pirate (9)
* mkrizek (1)
* pwhalen (1)
* pschindl (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot