[Test-Announce] 2012-11-07 @ 17:00 UTC - F18 Beta Blocker Bug Review #7

[Kamil Paral]

# F18 Beta Blocker Review meeting #7
# Date: 2012-11-07
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net

Note: The UTC time was changed. If your country switched from summer time to winter time
the last weekend, your local time of the meeting should stay the same.

Keeping with what we've done for the last couple of weeks, we're
planning to stop around the 3 hour mark if we're not done by then and
resume on 2012-11-08.

We'll be running through the beta blockers and nice-to-haves. The
current list of blocker bugs is available at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...

1. Whether they meet the Beta release criteria [1] and should stay
     on the list
2. Whether they are getting the attention they need

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria

For guidance on Blocker and Nice-to-have (NTH) bugs, please refer to
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process

For the blocker review meeting protocol, see
 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
_______________________________________________
test-announce mailing list
test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce

F18 Beta Blocker Bug Review #7 Minutes

[Tim Flink]

====================================
#fedora-qa: f18beta-blocker-review-7
====================================

Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-07/f18beta-blocker-rev...
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-07/f18beta-blocker-rev...
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-07/f18beta-blocker-rev...


Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (tflink, 17:03:24)

* Introduction  (tflink, 17:09:34)
  * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
    the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
    bugs.  (tflink, 17:09:43)
  * We'll be following the process outlined at:  (tflink, 17:09:50)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
    (tflink, 17:09:50)
  * The bugs up for review today are available at:  (tflink, 17:09:56)
  * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current   (tflink,
    17:09:56)
  * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:  (tflink,
    17:10:03)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria
    (tflink, 17:10:03)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria
    (tflink, 17:10:04)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria
    (tflink, 17:10:04)
  * 5 Proposed Blockers  (tflink, 17:10:19)
  * 11 Accepted Blockers  (tflink, 17:10:19)
  * 3 Proposed NTH  (tflink, 17:10:19)
  * 40 Accepted NTH  (tflink, 17:10:19)

* (873224) TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'NoneType' objects
  (tflink, 17:11:21)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873224   (tflink,
    17:11:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (tflink, 17:11:21)
  * AGREED: 873224 - RejectedBlocker (beta), AcceptedBlocker (final) -
    While anaconda doesn't support degraded RAID arrays, it shouldn't
    crash when one is encountered and is a conditional violation of the
    F18 final release criterion: "The installer must be able to create
    and install to any workable partition layout using any file system
    offered in a default installer configuration, LVM, software,
    hardware or BIOS RAID, or combination of the above"  (tflink,
    17:18:53)

* (873459) Upgraded system does not reboot if a kernel upgrade is part
  of the upgrade  (tflink, 17:20:15)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873459   (tflink,
    17:20:18)
  * Proposed Blocker, fedup-dracut, NEW  (tflink, 17:20:20)
  * AGREED: 873459 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a violation of the
    following F18 beta release criterion: "For each one of the
    release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully
    complete an upgrade from a fully updated installation of the
    previous stable Fedora release with that package set installed,
    using any officially recommended upgrade mechanisms. The upgraded
    system must meet all release criteria."  (tflink, 17:31:32)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_18_Upgrade_Testing
    (Viking-Ice, 17:32:31)

* (873576) parted hangs trying to inspect newly-created Intel fwraid
  RAID-1 array  (tflink, 17:33:22)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873576   (tflink,
    17:33:25)
  * Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW  (tflink, 17:33:28)
  * AGREED: 873576 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F18 beta
    release criterion for Intel FW RAID1/RAID5: "The installer must be
    able to create and install to software, hardware or BIOS RAID-0,
    RAID-1 or RAID-5 partitions for anything except /boot"  (tflink,
    17:41:35)

* (844167) Error in PREIN scriptlet in rpm package
  libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.4-3.fc17.x86_64  (tflink, 17:41:50)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844167   (tflink,
    17:41:53)
  * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, MODIFIED  (tflink, 17:41:56)
  * AGREED: 844167 - RejectedBlocker - After testing with fedup, this
    either appears to not affect that process or has been fixed in
    selinux-policy. Thus, rejecting as a blocker for F18 beta.  (tflink,
    17:50:19)

* (873865) langsupport groups not getting added  (tflink, 17:51:14)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873865   (tflink,
    17:51:14)
  * Proposed NTH, anaconda, POST  (tflink, 17:51:14)
  * AGREED: 873865 - AcceptedNTH - While not a blocker, it would be good
    to have all the needed fonts for non-english installs.  (tflink,
    17:56:32)

* (872989) gnome-screenshot does not work in fallback mode  (tflink,
  17:56:41)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872989   (tflink,
    17:56:41)
  * Proposed NTH, cairo, ON_QA  (tflink, 17:56:41)
  * AGREED: 872989 - RejectedNTH - While a potential issue, the only way
    that this can be hit is if you're running livemedia on a blacklisted
    adapter. This doesn't seem as if it would affect enough users to
    justify taking a cairo fix this late in beta.  (tflink, 18:02:00)

* (873342) RuntimeError: no window manager available  (tflink, 18:02:09)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873342   (tflink,
    18:02:09)
  * Proposed NTH, firstboot, ON_QA  (tflink, 18:02:09)
  * AGREED: 873342 - AcceptedNTH - This breaks MATE installs and as a
    non-release-blocking DE, this is NTH. A tested fix would be accepted
    past freeze.  (tflink, 18:09:58)

* (872446) ValueError: new size same as old size  (tflink, 19:11:56)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872446   (tflink,
    19:11:56)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 19:11:56)
  * still waiting on information from devs in bug about whether the most
    recent report is just a corner-case  (tflink, 19:17:18)

* (872739) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get'
  (tflink, 19:19:48)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872739   (tflink,
    19:19:48)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 19:19:48)
  * this is actually VERIFIED, was moved back to ON_QA by bodhi
    (tflink, 19:21:03)

* (872791) TypeError: Argument 1 does not allow None as a value
  (tflink, 19:21:21)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872791   (tflink,
    19:21:22)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (tflink, 19:21:22)
  * this failed QA for anaconda-18.26  (tflink, 19:22:24)
  * waiting for reproduction, logs and traceback  (tflink, 19:22:33)

* (867593) installer must stop relying on being able to tell kpartx to
  use a disk/partition delimiter  (tflink, 19:22:56)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867593   (tflink,
    19:22:59)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 19:23:02)
  * this needs re-testing to check the fix  (tflink, 19:23:24)
  * ACTION: tflink to re-test w/ dmraid  (tflink, 19:26:38)

* (869391) LUKSError: luks device has no key/passphrase  (tflink,
  19:26:49)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869391   (tflink,
    19:26:49)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 19:26:49)
  * a fix is available, more testing is needed  (tflink, 19:28:13)
  * request testing in bug  (tflink, 19:28:26)

* (873463) TypeError: sequence item 1: expected string, DiskDevice found
  (tflink, 19:28:47)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873463   (tflink,
    19:28:47)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED  (tflink, 19:28:47)
  * the fix has been tested in isolation but this still needs testing
    with a released anaconda  (tflink, 19:31:40)

* (868834) can't use package section in kickstart  (tflink, 19:32:50)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868834   (tflink,
    19:32:51)
  * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA  (tflink, 19:32:51)
  * this is actually VERIFIED, was moved back to ON_QA by bodhi
    (tflink, 19:33:23)

* (872047) fedup-dracut builds do not exist in F18  (tflink, 19:34:00)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872047   (tflink,
    19:34:00)
  * Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA  (tflink, 19:34:00)
  * there are now fedup-dracut builds in f18 updates-testing  (tflink,
    19:38:19)
  * move to VERIFIED and wait for a build to be pushed to stable
    (tflink, 19:38:38)

* (873387) After minimal install there is no login prompt on tty1
  (tflink, 19:39:28)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873387   (tflink,
    19:39:28)
  * Accepted Blocker, systemd, NEW  (tflink, 19:39:28)
  * testing and some investigation is going on  (tflink, 19:41:19)
  * retest with TC8 once everything has been pulled into stable, this
    may be fixed since it doesn't happen with netinstall  (tflink,
    19:42:38)

* Open Floor  (tflink, 19:44:26)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872608   (tflink,
    19:45:36)
  * if there are bugs that could be blockers, please propose them -
    preferrably with a criterion that the bug is violating  (tflink,
    19:48:34)
  * next blocker bug review meeting will be on 2012-11-14 @ 17:00 UTC
    (tflink, 19:49:08)

Meeting ended at 19:50:26 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* tflink to re-test w/ dmraid




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* tflink
  * tflink to re-test w/ dmraid
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tflink (239)
* adamw (122)
* kparal (60)
* Viking-Ice (37)
* jreznik (18)
* rishi (12)
* Martix (11)
* zodbot (9)
* jlk (9)
* nirik (7)
* pschindl (6)
* jreznik_ (3)
* thunderbirdtr (1)
* Cerlyn (1)
* satellit (1)
* CRCinAU (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot