Hi, while updating rawhide today it failed, even using --skip-broken. No surprise here. :-)
Following rawhide wisdom I decided to update by chunks.
Since I am curious about kde 4.1 I have updated kde* first, what follows is a list of problems I encountered:
$ yum update kde* ... Error: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/config.kcfg/pimemoticons.kcfg from install of kdepimlibs-4.0.72-2.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdepim-3.5.9-9.fc9.i386
To avoid this problem I updated while removing kdepim, this lead to the removal of tellico (note to self, do something about it) but it succeeded. I had some hiccups during the way:
... Updating : qt ####################### [16/87] Error unpacking rpm package 1:qt-4.4.0-1.fc10.i386 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/qt4/bin: cpio: rename ... Updating : kdegames ####################### [36/87] Cannot overwrite existing module Cannot overwrite existing module ... Cleanup : kdesdk-libs ####################### [86/87] Unable to look at what's on dbus
Since qt-4.4.0 was not installed I had to do it by hand.
2008/5/14 José Matos jamatos@fc.up.pt:
Updating : qt ####################### [16/87] Error unpacking rpm package 1:qt-4.4.0-1.fc10.i386 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/qt4/bin: cpio: rename
This is due to trying to replace /usr/lib/qt4/bin with a symlink to /usr/bin ... which isn't going to work. What's needed if this is insisted on, is symlinks there for the binaries in /usr/lib.
Updating : kdegames ####################### [36/87] Cannot overwrite existing module Cannot overwrite existing module
The ggz "install module" command in the scripts isn't conditionalised (although the "remove" one is).
Bill Crawford <billcrawford1970 <at> gmail.com> writes:
This is due to trying to replace /usr/lib/qt4/bin with a symlink to /usr/bin ... which isn't going to work. What's needed if this is insisted on, is symlinks there for the binaries in /usr/lib.
Right. I reverted this change as soon as this was reported (and we're working on doing this properly, essentially the way you suggest), but unfortunately it missed yesterday's Rawhide by a matter of minutes. It should be fixed in today's Rawhide.
Kevin Kofler
Have just u\g from F9Release to Rawhide (f10)
Yum update has brought up about a dozen dependence errors, do all get reported individually, or one report against yum-update.
Frank
Have just u\g from F9Release to Rawhide (f10)
Yum update has brought up about a dozen dependence errors, do all get reported individually, or one report against yum-update.
I'd do individual BZs.
Frank
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
José Matos wrote:
while updating rawhide today it failed, even using --skip-broken. No surprise here. :-)
FYI, http://rdieter.livejournal.com/6235.html
Following rawhide wisdom I decided to update by chunks.
Other than the qt issue (should be fixed in qt-4.4.0-2), bugzilla please.
-- Rex
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 14:55:12 Rex Dieter wrote:
I have tested kde 4.0.0, you don't scare me so easily. ;-)
And yes, I read the blog. :-)