OT: AntiSpam UOL <[e-mail]>

oops,

what happend with  "AntiSpam UOL "
5 postings to this list without the annoying messages :-)

the last i got was on
  Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:28:25 -0300 (BRT)
  From: AntiSpam UOL 
  To: shrek-m 
  Subject: RE: Re: Problem mounting network shares at boot

i hope that this is now history for all members of this list.

[Roy-Magne Mo]

ty den 28.02.2006 klokka 17:19 (+0100) skreiv [e-mail]:
> oops,
>
> what happend with  "AntiSpam UOL "
> 5 postings to this list without the annoying messages :-)
>
> the last i got was on
>   Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:28:25 -0300 (BRT)
>   From: AntiSpam UOL 
>   To: shrek-m 
>   Subject: RE: Re: Problem mounting network shares at boot

You only get it for the first one :(

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Tuesday 28 February 2006 11:26, Roy-Magne Mo wrote:
> ty den 28.02.2006 klokka 17:19 (+0100) skreiv [e-mail]:
> > oops,
> >
> > what happend with  "AntiSpam UOL "
> > 5 postings to this list without the annoying messages :-)
> >
> > the last i got was on
> >   Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:28:25 -0300 (BRT)
> >   From: AntiSpam UOL 
> >   To: shrek-m 
> >   Subject: RE: Re: Problem mounting network shares at boot
>
> You only get it for the first one :(

only if you click and validate there spam.  I have gotten it on every post for 
quite some time.  I refuse  to say  that it is an acceptable practice.  I 
guess whoever it is  doesn't get much List mail.

On 28.02.2006 18:26, Roy-Magne Mo wrote:
> You only get it for the first one :(

did you "click here" ?
i did not and will not.

$ grep "^From: AntiSpam UOL" 2006.sbd/fedora.sbd/spam | wc -l
59

[Mike A. Harris]

Roy-Magne Mo wrote:
> ty den 28.02.2006 klokka 17:19 (+0100) skreiv [e-mail]:
> > oops,
> >
> > what happend with  "AntiSpam UOL "
> > 5 postings to this list without the annoying messages :-)
> >
> > the last i got was on
> >  Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:28:25 -0300 (BRT)
> >  From: AntiSpam UOL 
> >  To: shrek-m 
> >  Subject: RE: Re: Problem mounting network shares at boot
>
> You only get it for the first one :(

No, you get it every single time, assuming you refuse to click on
the link and confirm to the idiots that their antispam system works.

Everyone who clicks on the link, helps uol.com.br to keep their
broken rediculous system functioning for the people who use it.
Filter them with procmail to /dev/null or block them at the MTA
level instead.

[John Summerfield]

Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Everyone who clicks on the link, helps uol.com.br to keep their
> broken rediculous system functioning for the people who use it.
> Filter them with procmail to /dev/null or block them at the MTA
> level instead.

This works for me. I've not seen one for months.

www:~# grep .br /etc/postfix/header-checks
/servadm.KAVOADM.kavo.com.br/ REJECT No thanks
/^From:.*AntiSpam.*uol.com.br/ REJECT Fix your mail service
www:~#

[Paul Dickson]

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:37:42 +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > Everyone who clicks on the link, helps uol.com.br to keep their
> > broken rediculous system functioning for the people who use it.
> > Filter them with procmail to /dev/null or block them at the MTA
> > level instead.
>
> This works for me. I've not seen one for months.
>
> www:~# grep .br /etc/postfix/header-checks
> /servadm.KAVOADM.kavo.com.br/ REJECT No thanks
> /^From:.*AntiSpam.*uol.com.br/ REJECT Fix your mail service
> www:~#

I'm now using in my .procmailrc:

:0 HBhb :
* ^From:.*uol.com.br
/dev/null

I haven't seen any since.

-Paul

[Jef Spaleta]

On 2/28/06, [e-mail]  wrote:
> i hope that this is now history for all members of this list.

Don't worry, instead of the antispam validation messages we are going
to get a series of posts from several long time members of all the
lists affected asking what happened to the antispam message and asking
other people to confirm.

Then we are going to get a set of messages from other long time list
members who consider the posts asking what happened to the antispam
messages as spam and will write to ridicule the other members for
writing about it and in fact adding spam to replace the original
antispam spam

Then we will get people posting who are going to write to ridicule the
people who ridiculed the people who were asking what happened to the
antispam spam, calling them hypocrites for spamming the lists
complaining about people spamming the list with offtopic discussions
about spam to the list.

Then we will get people who will spam the list with comments about how
unwelcoming the tone of discussion is and asking if we can just all
get along and will hand out flowers to everyone.

Then someone will grammar flame the person who was commenting on the
tone of messages involved in the spamming messages about offtopic
discussions about offtopic discussions about spamming about antispam
spam.

Then .....

Then someone will profit.

-jef"following circular logic, gets me motion sick"spaleta

[Michael Favia]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Then .....

We can rely on someone pointing out the inevitability and tiresome 
nature of it all in a slightly satirical yet sarcastic format. -mf