Broken dependencies with Fedora 12 + updates-testing - 2009-12-05

[Michael Schwendt]

======================================================================
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
======================================================================

Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):

    libmthca
    linuxwacom
    lsvpd
    mingw32-plib
    msp430-libc
    php-ZendFramework
    whatsup




======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-12-i386:

    libmthca-devel-static-1.0.5-3.fc12.i686  requires  libmthca = 0:1.0.5-3.fc12
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.i686  requires 
libosmvendor.so.2(OSMVENDOR_2.0)
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.i686  requires  libosmvendor.so.2
    lsvpd-1.6.5-3.fc12.i686  requires  libvpd_cxx-2.1.so.2
    php-ZendFramework-tests-1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12.noarch  requires  php-ZendFramework =
0:1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-12-ppc:

    libmthca-devel-static-1.0.5-3.fc12.ppc  requires  libmthca = 0:1.0.5-3.fc12
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.ppc  requires 
libosmvendor.so.2(OSMVENDOR_2.0)
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.ppc  requires  libosmvendor.so.2
    lsvpd-1.6.5-3.fc12.ppc  requires  libvpd_cxx-2.1.so.2
    php-ZendFramework-tests-1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12.noarch  requires  php-ZendFramework =
0:1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-12-ppc64:

    libmthca-devel-static-1.0.5-3.fc12.ppc64  requires  libmthca = 0:1.0.5-3.fc12
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.ppc64  requires 
libosmvendor.so.2(OSMVENDOR_2.0)(64bit)
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.ppc64  requires  libosmvendor.so.2()(64bit)
    lsvpd-1.6.5-3.fc12.ppc64  requires  libvpd_cxx-2.1.so.2()(64bit)
    php-ZendFramework-tests-1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12.noarch  requires  php-ZendFramework =
0:1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-12-x86_64:

    libmthca-devel-static-1.0.5-3.fc12.x86_64  requires  libmthca = 0:1.0.5-3.fc12
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.x86_64  requires 
libosmvendor.so.2(OSMVENDOR_2.0)(64bit)
    libnodeupdown-backend-openib-1.9-2.fc12.x86_64  requires  libosmvendor.so.2()(64bit)
    lsvpd-1.6.5-3.fc12.x86_64  requires  libvpd_cxx-2.1.so.2()(64bit)
    php-ZendFramework-tests-1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12.noarch  requires  php-ZendFramework =
0:1.8.4-3.PL1.fc12


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-12-ppc64:

    msp430-libc-0-3.20090726cvs.fc12.noarch  requires  msp430-gcc


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-12-i386:

    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.i686  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.i686  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0
    mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc12.noarch  requires  mingw32-plib =
0:{version}-{release}


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-12-ppc:

    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.ppc  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.ppc  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.ppc64  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.ppc64  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0()(64bit)
    mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc12.noarch  requires  mingw32-plib =
0:{version}-{release}


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-12-ppc64:

    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.ppc64  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.ppc64  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0()(64bit)
    mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc12.noarch  requires  mingw32-plib =
0:{version}-{release}


======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-12-x86_64:

    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.i686  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.i686  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.x86_64  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
    linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.x86_64  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0()(64bit)
    mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc12.noarch  requires  mingw32-plib =
0:{version}-{release}

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:45:16 -0000, me wrote:

> ======================================================================
>  Broken packages in fedora-updates-testing-12-i386:
>  
>      linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.i686  requires  linuxwacom = 0:0.8.2.2-17.fc12
>      linuxwacom-devel-0.8.2.2-17.fc12.i686  requires  libwacomcfg.so.0 
Before someone asks, these are _not_ false positives. There's a
questionable Obsoletes tag set in the xorg-x11-drv-wacom package that
obsoletes linuxwacom.

[Matthew Saltzman]

On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 10:45 +0000, Michael Schwendt wrote: 
> ======================================================================
>  The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>  ======================================================================
>  
>  Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
>  
>      libmthca
>      linuxwacom
>      lsvpd
>      mingw32-plib
>      msp430-libc
>      php-ZendFramework
>      whatsup 
Is the fact that evolution-rss-0.1.4-7 does not depend on evolution
2.28.1 a false negative here?

Thanks.

-- 
                Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:23:13 -0500, Matthew wrote:

>  >
> ======================================================================
>  > The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>  > ======================================================================
>  > 
>  > Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
>  > 
>  >     libmthca
>  >     linuxwacom
>  >     lsvpd
>  >     mingw32-plib
>  >     msp430-libc
>  >     php-ZendFramework
>  >     whatsup
>  
>  Is the fact that evolution-rss-0.1.4-7 does not depend on evolution
>  2.28.1 a false negative here? 
These reports are about existing albeit unresolvable dependencies.


Are you trying to say evolution-rss should "Requires: evolution >= 2.28.1"
although in Fedora there is only evolution 2.28.0?
The update requests in bodhi are still without comments:

evolution-rss-0.1.4-7.fc12  -> updates-testing
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11091

evolution-rss-0.1.4-10.fc12  -> pending (it looks like it was withdrawn)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12142

[Matthew Saltzman]

On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 01:11 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: 
>  On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:23:13 -0500, Matthew wrote:
>  
>  > > ======================================================================
>  > > The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>  > > ======================================================================
>  > > 
>  > > Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
>  > > 
>  > >     libmthca
>  > >     linuxwacom
>  > >     lsvpd
>  > >     mingw32-plib
>  > >     msp430-libc
>  > >     php-ZendFramework
>  > >     whatsup
>  > 
>  > Is the fact that evolution-rss-0.1.4-7 does not depend on evolution
>  > 2.28.1 a false negative here?
>  
>  These reports are about existing albeit unresolvable dependencies.
>  
>  
>  Are you trying to say evolution-rss should "Requires: evolution >= 2.28.1"
>  although in Fedora there is only evolution 2.28.0? 
Yes, for evolution-rss-0.1.4-7 and beyond.  The patch to work with
2.28.1 makes it no longer work with 2.28.0.

>  The update requests in bodhi are still without comments:
>  
>  evolution-rss-0.1.4-7.fc12  -> updates-testing
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11091 
Just added a comment there.

Thanks.

>  
>  evolution-rss-0.1.4-10.fc12  -> pending (it looks like it was withdrawn)
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12142
>  
>   

-- 
                Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs

[Adam Williamson]

On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:26 +0000, Matthew Saltzman wrote:

>  > Are you trying to say evolution-rss should "Requires:
> evolution >= 2.28.1"
>  > although in Fedora there is only evolution 2.28.0?
>  
>  Yes, for evolution-rss-0.1.4-7 and beyond.  The patch to work with
>  2.28.1 makes it no longer work with 2.28.0. 
That's not something an automated script check can catch.

>  > The update requests in bodhi are still without comments:
>  > 
>  > evolution-rss-0.1.4-7.fc12  -> updates-testing
>  > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11091
>  
>  Just added a comment there. 
That's the correct procedure; thanks :)

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net