On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 14:51:02 -0800,
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:26 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> When updating today I noticed that /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/package.conf was not
> updated, but rather a .rpmnew file was created. I took a look at
> /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/package.conf and it doesn't look like a normal conf
> file (that one might edit by hand).
> My guess is that either it shouldn't be getting treated like a conf file
> (and hence just be replaced) or the file should be in /etc not /lib.
> Since I am not familiar with how this is used, I figured I'd run it by
> here first before filing a bug.
I believe it shouldn't be considered a configuration file, if I were you
I'd file a bug on the package suggesting it not be marked as such.
OK, when I get a bit more caught up on stuff I file a bug commenting on it.
I saw there was at least one more config file in /lib. Once I actually
get updated after the mass rebuild, I'll search for *.rpmnew in /lib
and look at filing some bugs.