Hey folks! Just a quick mail to suggest we stop sending minutes from the QA and blocker bug review meetings to test@. There is a system in place now which automatically sends minutes to the dedicated mailing list, meetingminutes - you can see that both QA and blocker bug meetings are present in the archives there:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/2015 -May/date.html
you can also find the minutes directly in meetbot:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora-qa/ http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/
and I still update the wiki page with links to the QA minutes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
On 05/04/2015 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey folks! Just a quick mail to suggest we stop sending minutes from the QA and blocker bug review meetings to test@. There is a system in place now which automatically sends minutes to the dedicated mailing list, meetingminutes - you can see that both QA and blocker bug meetings are present in the archives there:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/2015 -May/date.html
you can also find the minutes directly in meetbot:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora-qa/ http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/
and I still update the wiki page with links to the QA minutes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
No, I wouldn't miss them. +1
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:43:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
and I still update the wiki page with links to the QA minutes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings so I think it's well enough covered. ...
And, they are also sent to twitter with a wordcloud visualization:
https://twitter.com/fedobot/status/595281492445700096
so there's that, if the other ways weren't catching your attention. :)
On 05/04/2015 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Personally, I feel it would be convenient to see the meeting minutes on test@. May be I am just lazy! :)
subscribing to meetingminuts@ means I get all meetingminutes .. :(
Mukundan.
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 19:40 -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 05/04/2015 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Personally, I feel it would be convenient to see the meeting minutes on test@. May be I am just lazy! :)
subscribing to meetingminuts@ means I get all meetingminutes .. :(
You can bookmark the archives page, though? still, i'll see how many people say this...
On 05/05/2015 06:10 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 05/04/2015 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Personally, I feel it would be convenient to see the meeting minutes on test@. May be I am just lazy! :)
+1 to this.. It is more convenient for me to see MOM on list, May be because I am doing this for long and don't want to change my style :)
subscribing to meetingminuts@ means I get all meetingminutes .. :(
Thinking about this... May be I will miss minutes rather searching them on separate list :(
- Amita
Mukundan.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Do you mean the full minutes or the log.html link? I prefer still getting the email with the link on test@, I'm unlikely to go elsewhere or subscribe to another list to get that.
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:40 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Do you mean the full minutes or the log.html link? I prefer still getting the email with the link on test@, I'm unlikely to go elsewhere or subscribe to another list to get that.
Would the others who like the mails-to-list be OK with just a link to the meetbot minutes?
Also, do you want both the QA and blocker bug meeting minutes, or is it mainly the QA meeting?
Thanks!
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:40 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Do you mean the full minutes or the log.html link? I prefer still getting the email with the link on test@, I'm unlikely to go elsewhere or subscribe to another list to get that.
Would the others who like the mails-to-list be OK with just a link to the meetbot minutes?
Yes. Although the action/info item included as the summary is useful to determine whether I'd go read the full logs.
Also, do you want both the QA and blocker bug meeting minutes, or is it mainly the QA meeting?
Both, but I don't care if they're collated into a single email.
On 05/06/15 01:15, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:40 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Do you mean the full minutes or the log.html link? I prefer still getting the email with the link on test@, I'm unlikely to go elsewhere or subscribe to another list to get that.
Would the others who like the mails-to-list be OK with just a link to the meetbot minutes?
Yes. Although the action/info item included as the summary is useful to determine whether I'd go read the full logs.
Also, do you want both the QA and blocker bug meeting minutes, or is it mainly the QA meeting?
Both, but I don't care if they're collated into a single email.
Same here....
On 05/05/2015 10:53 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:40 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Do you mean the full minutes or the log.html link? I prefer still getting the email with the link on test@, I'm unlikely to go elsewhere or subscribe to another list to get that.
Would the others who like the mails-to-list be OK with just a link to the meetbot minutes?
Just the link would certainly still be convenient for me ...
Also, do you want both the QA and blocker bug meeting minutes, or is it mainly the QA meeting?
Thanks!
I usually read both considering I can never really attend any of the meetings (work clash).
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 15:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey folks! Just a quick mail to suggest we stop sending minutes from the QA and blocker bug review meetings to test@. There is a system in place now which automatically sends minutes to the dedicated mailing list, meetingminutes - you can see that both QA and blocker bug meetings are present in the archives there:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/2015 -May/date.html
you can also find the minutes directly in meetbot:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora-qa/ http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/
and I still update the wiki page with links to the QA minutes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Works for me. I've been looking at meetingminutes@ for a while already now. Plus we have notifications too.
On May 5, 2015 6:43 AM, "Adam Williamson" adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hey folks! Just a quick mail to suggest we stop sending minutes from the QA and blocker bug review meetings to test@. There is a system in place now which automatically sends minutes to the dedicated mailing list, meetingminutes - you can see that both QA and blocker bug meetings are present in the archives there:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/2015 -May/date.html
you can also find the minutes directly in meetbot:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fedora-qa/ http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/
and I still update the wiki page with links to the QA minutes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks! --
I would not miss them here. I actually prefer them on the meeting minutes list as it is easier for me to sort and keep in one place.
On Mon, 04 May 2015 15:43:19 -0700 Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
<snip>
so I think it's well enough covered. Would anyone miss the minutes if they weren't sent to test@ any more? Thanks!
Wouldn't bother me - I usually look in the meetbot archives first if I'm looking for something in the minutes anyways.
Tim
-
Adam Williamson -
Amita -
Ankur Sinha -
Chris Murphy -
Dan Mossor -
Ed Greshko -
Matthew Miller -
Mukundan Ragavan -
Tim Flink