1:09 p.m.
I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance these can
have there own mailing list?
1:12 p.m.
On 7/5/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance these can
have there own mailing list?
Going back to June 1st, there is a good 600+ e-mails just for these
updates. I think if people have real issues or questions about rawhide in
general there getting hidden. :)
1:16 p.m.
On 7/5/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/5/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance these can
have there own mailing list?
Going back to June 1st, there is a good 600+ e-mails just for these
updates. I think if people have real issues or questions about rawhide in
general there getting hidden. :)
Agreed, one email per batch of updates?
4:58 p.m.
"Dr. Diesel" <dr.diesel(a)gmail.com> writes:
On 7/5/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance these can
> have there own mailing list?
Agreed, one email per batch of updates?
Digested mailing lists suck ... or at least, please don't force that
mode on those who don't like 'em.
A separate mail list would be fine with me though, especially if it had
Reply-To pointing to the regular discussion list.
regards, tom lane
5:17 p.m.
On 7/5/07, Tom Lane <tgl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
"Dr. Diesel" <dr.diesel(a)gmail.com> writes:
> On 7/5/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance these can
>> have there own mailing list?
> Agreed, one email per batch of updates?
Digested mailing lists suck ... or at least, please don't force that
mode on those who don't like 'em.
A separate mail list would be fine with me though, especially if it had
Reply-To pointing to the regular discussion list.
regards, tom lane
I'm not suggesting digest, just a bulk mail per batch, then all as normal.
9:37 p.m.
On 7/5/07, Dr. Diesel <dr.diesel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/5/07, Tom Lane <tgl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> "Dr. Diesel" <dr.diesel(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > On 7/5/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance these
can
> >> have there own mailing list?
>
> > Agreed, one email per batch of updates?
>
> Digested mailing lists suck ... or at least, please don't force that
> mode on those who don't like 'em.
>
> A separate mail list would be fine with me though, especially if it had
> Reply-To pointing to the regular discussion list.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
I'm not suggesting digest, just a bulk mail per batch, then all as normal.
Like the daily rawhide report correct?
3:20 a.m.
On 06/07/07, Justin Conover <justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/5/07, Dr. Diesel <dr.diesel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/5/07, Tom Lane <tgl(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > "Dr. Diesel" <dr.diesel(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > > On 7/5/07, Justin Conover < justin.conover(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I don't know if this has been brought up before, but any chance
> these can
> > >> have there own mailing list?
> >
> > > Agreed, one email per batch of updates?
> >
> > Digested mailing lists suck ... or at least, please don't force that
> > mode on those who don't like 'em.
> >
> > A separate mail list would be fine with me though, especially if it
> had
> > Reply-To pointing to the regular discussion list.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> I'm not suggesting digest, just a bulk mail per batch, then all as
> normal.
>
Like the daily rawhide report correct?
I'm all for it. Currently I'm filtering all the updates emails > /dev/null
Chris
--
http://www.chruz.com
6177
days inactive
6178
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andy Lawrence -
Christopher Brown -
Justin Conover -
Tom Lane