redhat-config-securitylevel i386?

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hi,

 Is redhat-config-securitylevel really ment to have changed from noarch to 
i386? I don't see anything architecture dependent in this package.

 By the way, I noticed an entry for redhat-config-securitylevel-tui was not 
yet added to bugzilla.

Bye,
Leonard.

--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo!
End all weapons of mass destruction.

[Brent Fox]

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 14:33, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>  Hi,
>  
>   Is redhat-config-securitylevel really ment to have changed from noarch to 
>  i386? I don't see anything architecture dependent in this package. 
lokkit.c was moved from lokkit into redhat-config-securitylevel, which
explains the change from noarch.

>   By the way, I noticed an entry for redhat-config-securitylevel-tui
> was not 
>  yet added to bugzilla. 
The redhat-config-securitylevel-tui package now exists in Rawhide.


Cheers,
   Brent

[Bill Nottingham]

Leonard den Ottolander (leonardjo(a)hetnet.nl) said: 
>   Is redhat-config-securitylevel really ment to have changed from
> noarch to 
>  i386? I don't see anything architecture dependent in this package. 
The TUI parts are architecture specific, and you can't build
noarch and <arch> in the same SRPM.

>   By the way, I noticed an entry for redhat-config-securitylevel-tui
> was not 
>  yet added to bugzilla. 
bugzilla components are by source RPM, not binary RPM.

Bill

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hi Bill,

>  The TUI parts are architecture specific, and you can't build
>  noarch and <arch> in the same SRPM. 
>  bugzilla components are by source RPM, not binary RPM. 
 That explains it all. Thanks.

Leonard.

--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo!
End all weapons of mass destruction.