3:33 a.m.
I started to get such messages in dmesg:
IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
4:26 a.m.
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, dragoran wrote:
I started to get such messages in dmesg:
IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
Seeing the same. FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111).
Gilboa
4:37 a.m.
Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, dragoran wrote:
> I started to get such messages in dmesg:
> IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
> IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
> IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
> what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
>
>
Seeing the same. FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111).
Gilboa
forgott to write this
FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111)
here too
should I fill a bug?
4:42 a.m.
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 11:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>
>> I started to get such messages in dmesg:
>> IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
>> IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
>> IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
>> what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
>>
>>
>
> Seeing the same. FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111).
>
> Gilboa
>
>
forgott to write this
FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111)
here too
should I fill a bug?
Please do. (And post a URL)
Gilboa
4:52 a.m.
Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 11:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I started to get such messages in dmesg:
>>> IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
>>> IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
>>> IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
>>> what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Seeing the same. FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111).
>>
>> Gilboa
>>
>>
>>
> forgott to write this
>
> FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111)
>
> here too
> should I fill a bug?
>
Please do. (And post a URL)
Gilboa
done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192586
5:34 a.m.
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 11:52 +0200, dragoran wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 11:37 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>
>> Gilboa Davara wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I started to get such messages in dmesg:
>>>> IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
>>>> IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
>>>> IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
>>>> what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Seeing the same. FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111).
>>>
>>> Gilboa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> forgott to write this
>>
>> FC5/x86_64, latest kernel (2111)
>>
>> here too
>> should I fill a bug?
>>
>
> Please do. (And post a URL)
>
> Gilboa
>
>
done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192586
Thanks.
Gilboa
9:16 a.m.
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, dragoran wrote:
I started to get such messages in dmesg:
IA32 syscall 311 from mozilla-xremote not implemented
IA32 syscall 311 from firefox-bin not implemented
IA32 syscall 311 from mplayer not implemented
what is syscall 311 and what effect does this have?
it's a syscall new in 2.6.17-rc's... it's not in 2.6.16
glibc seems to try to see if it's there ... harmless because it knows
how to fall back.
6575
days inactive
6575
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Arjan van de Ven -
dragoran -
Gilboa Davara