Re: Kernel failure

[Timothy Murphy]

On Wednesday 12 November 2008 23:14:32 Kyle McMartin wrote:

>  > Is everyone getting a "Kernel failure" message
>  > with the latest kernel, 2.6.27.4-79.fc10.i686 ? 
>  It would be helpful if you could attach a bit more of the context
> around
>  this. There should be a bit of spew with it that would help us debug it. 
I'm still getting the same message with kernel-2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 .
The full backtrace reads:

Kernel failure message 1:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:463 sysfs_add_one+0x2a/0x36()
sysfs: duplicate filename '1' can not be created
Modules linked in:
Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 #1
[<c042bb3a>] warn_slowpath+0x4b/0x6c
[<c051cd00>] ? vsnprintf+0x333/0x54e
[<c04026bf>] ? __switch_to+0xb9/0x139
[<c0518635>] ? idr_get_empty_slot+0x12a/0x1d9
[<c05187b4>] ? ida_get_new_above+0xd0/0x171
[<c04cbf58>] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x11
[<c04a08e3>] ? ifind+0x55/0x60
[<c04cc14b>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x16/0x27
[<c04cc29d>] sysfs_add_one+0x2a/0x36
[<c04cc73a>] create_dir+0x43/0x68
[<c04cc78c>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2d/0x41
[<c051912c>] kobject_add_internal+0xb2/0x153
[<c0519278>] kobject_add_varg+0x35/0x41
[<c05192a4>] kobject_init_and_add+0x20/0x22
[<c05270ee>] pci_create_slot+0x93/0xe1
[<c056228c>] register_slot+0x14f/0x1e7
[<c044042c>] ? up+0x2b/0x2f
[<c05538ce>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
[<c05521b1>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x46/0x66
[<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
[<c056210c>] walk_p2p_bridge+0xb7/0xe8
[<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
[<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
[<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
[<c05538ce>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
[<c05521b1>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x46/0x66
[<c0562055>] ? walk_p2p_bridge+0x0/0xe8
[<c0562008>] acpi_pci_slot_add+0x10d/0x15a
[<c0562055>] ? walk_p2p_bridge+0x0/0xe8
[<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
[<c0560809>] acpi_pci_register_driver+0x39/0x50
[<c08356b4>] acpi_pci_slot_init+0x17/0x1b
[<c0401125>] _stext+0x3d/0x115
[<c083569d>] ? acpi_pci_slot_init+0x0/0x1b
[<c0464a58>] ? register_irq_proc+0x92/0xae
[<c0464ab1>] ? init_irq_proc+0x3d/0x4a
[<c0814362>] kernel_init+0x177/0x1c5
[<c08141eb>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1c5
[<c04048f7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
=======================
---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---

Kernel failure

[Antonio Olivares]

--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Timothy Murphy <gayleard(a)eircom.net&gt; wrote:

>  From: Timothy Murphy <gayleard(a)eircom.net&gt;
>  Subject: Re: Kernel failure
>  To: "Kyle McMartin" <kyle(a)infradead.org&gt;
>  Cc: fedora-kernel-list(a)redhat.com, "For testers of Fedora Core development
> releases" <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 3:45 PM
>  On Wednesday 12 November 2008 23:14:32 Kyle McMartin wrote:
>  
>  > > Is everyone getting a "Kernel failure"
>  message
>  > > with the latest kernel, 2.6.27.4-79.fc10.i686 ?
>  
>  > It would be helpful if you could attach a bit more of
>  the context around
>  > this. There should be a bit of spew with it that would
>  help us debug it.
>  
>  I'm still getting the same message with
>  kernel-2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 .
>  The full backtrace reads:
>  
>  Kernel failure message 1:
>  ------------[ cut here ]------------
>  WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:463 sysfs_add_one+0x2a/0x36()
>  sysfs: duplicate filename '1' can not be created
>  Modules linked in:
>  Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 #1
>  [<c042bb3a>] warn_slowpath+0x4b/0x6c
>  [<c051cd00>] ? vsnprintf+0x333/0x54e
>  [<c04026bf>] ? __switch_to+0xb9/0x139
>  [<c0518635>] ? idr_get_empty_slot+0x12a/0x1d9
>  [<c05187b4>] ? ida_get_new_above+0xd0/0x171
>  [<c04cbf58>] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x11
>  [<c04a08e3>] ? ifind+0x55/0x60
>  [<c04cc14b>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x16/0x27
>  [<c04cc29d>] sysfs_add_one+0x2a/0x36
>  [<c04cc73a>] create_dir+0x43/0x68
>  [<c04cc78c>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2d/0x41
>  [<c051912c>] kobject_add_internal+0xb2/0x153
>  [<c0519278>] kobject_add_varg+0x35/0x41
>  [<c05192a4>] kobject_init_and_add+0x20/0x22
>  [<c05270ee>] pci_create_slot+0x93/0xe1
>  [<c056228c>] register_slot+0x14f/0x1e7
>  [<c044042c>] ? up+0x2b/0x2f
>  [<c05538ce>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
>  [<c05521b1>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x46/0x66
>  [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
>  [<c056210c>] walk_p2p_bridge+0xb7/0xe8
>  [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
>  [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
>  [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
>  [<c05538ce>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
>  [<c05521b1>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x46/0x66
>  [<c0562055>] ? walk_p2p_bridge+0x0/0xe8
>  [<c0562008>] acpi_pci_slot_add+0x10d/0x15a
>  [<c0562055>] ? walk_p2p_bridge+0x0/0xe8
>  [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
>  [<c0560809>] acpi_pci_register_driver+0x39/0x50
>  [<c08356b4>] acpi_pci_slot_init+0x17/0x1b
>  [<c0401125>] _stext+0x3d/0x115
>  [<c083569d>] ? acpi_pci_slot_init+0x0/0x1b
>  [<c0464a58>] ? register_irq_proc+0x92/0xae
>  [<c0464ab1>] ? init_irq_proc+0x3d/0x4a
>  [<c0814362>] kernel_init+0x177/0x1c5
>  [<c08141eb>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1c5
>  [<c04048f7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>  =======================
>  ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
>  
>  
>  --  
Have you tried with newer kernel 

[root@riohigh2 ~]# uname -a
Linux riohigh2 2.6.27.5-101.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Wed Nov 12 00:50:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386
GNU/Linux
?

Regards,

Antonio

Kernel failure

[potat0]

Since today I have the exact same error on my Fedora 9 with Kernel 2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i686 #1
SMP Wed Nov 12 18:56:28 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux.

Is there a solution for the “problem”? I’m using an IBM Thinkpad X40.


-- 
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=304035&t...
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster(a)fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame
mail(a)erikstreb.de.

Kernel failure

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 15:18 +0100, wicking wrote:
>  Since today I have the exact same error on my Fedora 9 with Kernel
> 2.6.27.5-37.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Wed Nov 12 18:56:28 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux.
>  
>  Is there a solution for the “problem”? I’m using an IBM Thinkpad X40. 
What problem? Your message isn't threaded with the one it apparently
relates to, and you don't quote the latter, so it's not clear what
you're talking about.

poc

PS If you can avoid using Yahoo mail you might find it easier to use
this list.

Kernel failure

[potat0]

Today I found an adverse effect obviously caused by this kernel failure: I can find no
more wireless networks. Normally I have about 25 from my neighbours, but today I can find
nary.

Nobody else with this problems?
My WLAN adapter: 

	02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01)


-- 
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=304123&t...
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster(a)fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame
mail(a)erikstreb.de.

Kernel failure

[Chuck Anderson]

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:18:34PM +0100, wicking wrote:
>  Today I found an adverse effect obviously caused by this kernel 
>  failure: I can find no more wireless networks. Normally I have about 
>  25 from my neighbours, but today I can find nary.
>  
>  Nobody else with this problems?
>  My WLAN adapter: 
>  
>  	02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01)
I have no problems with wireless and I am seeing this same error.  
Bugzilla filed:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471745

Kernel failure

[Joshua C.]

2008/11/16 Chuck Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu&gt;:
>  On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:18:34PM +0100, wicking wrote:
> > Today I found an adverse effect obviously caused by this kernel
> > failure: I can find no more wireless networks. Normally I have about
> > 25 from my neighbours, but today I can find nary.
> >
> > Nobody else with this problems?
> > My WLAN adapter:
> >
> >       02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC
> (rev 01)
>
>  I have no problems with wireless and I am seeing this same error.
>  Bugzilla filed:
>
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471745
>
>  --
>  fedora-test-list mailing list
>  fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe:
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>  
Did you tried madwifi or  just the ath5k? I have 08:04.0 Ethernet
controller [0200]: Atheros Communications Inc. AR2413 802.11bg NIC
[168c:001a] (rev 01) which is a revision of AR5212 802.11bg and it
works fine here. (I think, though, madwifi works better with this
card, than ath5k)

Kernel failure

[Michael Francis]

Hello, I'm using 9 also when I upgraded to the new kernel I kept the old one
on so I could track it, or do a test. The other thing is do you know which
mini-card is your machine, if so use a adapter card with the same card type
and see if that card will bring up the network your near.Im on a lenovo 60
which uses atheros  AR5212 mini-card. The kernel problems may be a symptom
of selinux doing its job. So again if you have a adapter that is also using
atheros chipset if that will get back on. See yer!

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:18 AM, wicking <no-reply-gw(a)fcp.surfsite.org&gt;wrote:

>  Today I found an adverse effect obviously caused by this kernel
> failure: I
>  can find no more wireless networks. Normally I have about 25 from my
>  neighbours, but today I can find nary.
>
>  Nobody else with this problems?
>  My WLAN adapter:
>
>         02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR5212
>  802.11abg NIC (rev 01)
>
>
>  --
>  This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal
>  https://fcp.surfsite.org
>
>
> https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=304123&t...
>  If you think, this is spam, please report this to
>  webmaster(a)fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame mail(a)erikstreb.de.
>
>  --
>  fedora-test-list mailing list
>  fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe:
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>