June 2008 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 238044] /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238044 stransky(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(piergiorgio.sartor | |(a)nexgo.de) ------- Additional Comments From stransky(a)redhat.com 2008-06-04 03:57 EST ------- Test on F9 is fine. Leave it in needinfo until you do the alsaunmute test, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 238044] /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238044 piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(piergiorgio.sartor| |(a)nexgo.de) | ------- Additional Comments From piergiorgio.sartor(a)nexgo.de 2008-06-04 03:42 EST ------- Some additional side notes. I upgraded to F9, so I'll have to re-test in order to see if the problem is still there. You mention "env variables", but the man page of "salsa" does not say anything about those nor the man page of "alsactl", maybe some clarification will be needed also there. I'll try "alsaunmute" as soon as possible. Thanks. pg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 428281] qpxtool doesn't work under kernel 2.6.23.12-52.fc7

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qpxtool doesn't work under kernel 2.6.23.12-52.fc7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428281 ------- Additional Comments From djg(a)pdp8online.com 2008-06-03 20:50 EST ------- Still fails with a segmentation fault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 244431] DVD-based upgrades don't let the user know they still need to run 'yum upgrade'

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: DVD-based upgrades don't let the user know they still need to run 'yum upgrade' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244431 notting(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(david.rowe(a)freeuk.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From notting(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 20:39 EST ------- I'm fairly certain it's still there, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 345701] FC7 upgrade fails

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC7 upgrade fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345701 ------- Additional Comments From raytodd(a)kiva.net 2008-06-03 17:53 EST ------- Don't have this problem with FC9. In fact the solution was that I switched this machines to fc9 beta. I also basically did a scratch install and then reloaded the configs. Don't have any machines experiencing this particular problem any more -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 328601] Installation fails with multiple EIDE drives

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Installation fails with multiple EIDE drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328601 alindebe(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sneaky@sneakydave. | |com) ------- Additional Comments From alindebe(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 17:30 EST ------- Have you encountered the same problem when upgrading to Fedora 9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 322491] Need to better check if partitions are in use/mounted before using for install

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Need to better check if partitions are in use/mounted before using for install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322491 alindebe(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From alindebe(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 17:29 EST ------- If anybody encounters this problem in Fedora 9, please reopen the report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 253510] Anaconda segfaults during package installation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Anaconda segfaults during package installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253510 alindebe(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(astrand(a)lysator.li | |u.se) ------- Additional Comments From alindebe(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 17:28 EST ------- Have you encountered the same problem when upgrading to Fedora 9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 252226] non-label fstab entries needlessly require reboot on network upgrade

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: non-label fstab entries needlessly require reboot on network upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252226 alindebe(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(thepiratekings@yah | |oo.com) ------- Additional Comments From alindebe(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 17:27 EST ------- Have you encountered the same issue in Fedora 9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 252155] Anaconda generates bad grub config for RAID

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Anaconda generates bad grub config for RAID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252155 alindebe(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(urilabob(a)gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From alindebe(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 17:26 EST ------- Have you encountered the same problem in Fedora 9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage June 2008