June 2008 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 366321] traceback during install of x86_64 live image while adding mount point to existing home dir (no format)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: traceback during install of x86_64 live image while adding mount point to existing home dir (no format) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366321 alindebe(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup Flag| |needinfo?(poelstra(a)redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From alindebe(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 16:05 EST ------- Are you able to reproduce this bug in F9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 177768] hpijs does not support 1200x1200dpi on DP Deskjet 1280

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hpijs does not support 1200x1200dpi on DP Deskjet 1280 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177768 dwlegg(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dwlegg(a)gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dwlegg(a)gmail.com 2008-06-03 15:23 EST ------- I printed it like this on my FC7 box: lp -oraw -dDeskjet_1280 hpdj1280-f9.prn The CUPS test page magically appeared, but claiming that the resolution was 300x300dpi. Was that what you intended? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 15:10 EST ------- For a Fedora 8 system, it might be worth trying the latest 2.6.25.x-based kernel: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel/2.6.25.4/14.fc8/ For a Fedora 9 system: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel/2.6.25.4/39.fc9/ The two should have more or less identical firewire stacks in them. Also, I now have a pismo powerbook in-house myself, though I need to fetch it back from someone else in the office, so I can do some prodding there as well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 kylev(a)kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #308269|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From kylev(a)kylev.com 2008-06-03 14:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=308275) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308275&action=view) Fix rpmlint warnings and .egg-related build error, take 2 Understood. In this particular instance, just using %{python_sitelib}/Pyrex* in the %files section will catch the .egg that gets auto-built on rawhide and also works if we want to push the update to both F-8 and F-9. I don't want to start much of a debate, I'm mostly just trying to understand the ins and outs of when and where we can easily keep one spec file around and push updates to all branches with the easy "copy the .spec from devel to F-8 and F-9" method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-03 14:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, not necessarily, but if the branches aren't synchronized then you may not > really have much choice. Of course I mean what you say. i.e. usually we cannot expect that spec file targeted for devel branch also builds on F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: Pyrex (not |Merge Review: Pyrex |started) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes(a)redhat.com 2008-06-03 13:56 EST ------- The spec file may have to be modified separately on the F-9 branch if we upgrade there. I don't plan to upgrade this package for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 ------- Additional Comments From orion(a)cora.nwra.com 2008-06-03 13:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > If you add a "cat" pipe does it work without AVC messages? It appears to remove the avc messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2008-06-03 13:44 EST ------- Well, not necessarily, but if the branches aren't synchronized then you may not really have much choice. There's not much point in reviewing the F-8 branch if the maintainer is doing their work on the devel branch how, and you can't really expect what's in devel/ to build on F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-03 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > However, your current devel/ spec doesn't build on my F-8 system. Merge review must be done on rawhide machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage June 2008