July 2008 - triage - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 184446] libstdc++ requires execmem priviledge on ppc platform

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libstdc++ requires execmem priviledge on ppc platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184446 jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 184446] libstdc++ requires execmem priviledge on ppc platform

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libstdc++ requires execmem priviledge on ppc platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184446 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|jakub(a)redhat.com |jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-13 22:06 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ghc-gtk2hs won't install |ghc-gtk2hs won't install |with 256 MB RAM |with only 256MB RAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with 256 MB RAM

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ghc-gtk2hs won't install with 256 MB RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-|ghc-gtk2hs won't install |gtk2hs, won't install with |with 256 MB RAM |256 MB RAM | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 ------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com 2008-07-16 02:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Shared library support should arrive in 6.10 Oh cool! Finally! ;) We will probably need to revise the Haskell packaging guidelines for that then. (In reply to comment #7) > And since installing from source certainly generates the .o files, does that > not cast some doubt on the theory that, when the rpm generates the .o files > at install time, that's really the problem? Yes, my guess could be wrong. :) > # time make install > -- completed in 41 seconds Does that install .o files too? If not, can you try say running: ghc-pkg update --auto-ghci-libs /usr/lib/ghc/6.8.2/gtk2hs/gtk.package.conf by hand? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 251491] "import decimal" fails in turkish locale

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: "import decimal" fails in turkish locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251491 sertacyildiz(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Version|7 |9 ------- Additional Comments From sertacyildiz(a)gmail.com 2008-07-15 23:50 EST ------- same with python-2.5.1-26.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 249675] w3m charset declaration parser fails with turkish locale

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: w3m charset declaration parser fails with turkish locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249675 sertacyildiz(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Version|7 |9 ------- Additional Comments From sertacyildiz(a)gmail.com 2008-07-15 23:47 EST ------- $ rpm -q w3m w3m-0.5.2-10.fc9.i386 $ echo uüoösş |iconv -t iso-8859-9 | LANG=tr_TR.UTF-8 w3m -I ISO-8859-9 -dump u?o?s? $ echo uüoösş |iconv -t iso-8859-9 | LANG=tr_TR.UTF-8 w3m -I iso-8859-9 -dump uüoösş -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 245244] radeon 9100 + dvi == failure, should work out of box

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: radeon 9100 + dvi == failure, should work out of box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245244 mcepl(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lsof(a)nodata.co.uk)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 198929] RFE: BZflag needs an init.d script

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RFE: BZflag needs an init.d script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198929 poelstra(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords| |FutureFeature ------- Additional Comments From poelstra(a)redhat.com 2008-07-15 17:17 EST ------- add FutureFeature keyword -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 266061] Volume manager window is not the right size

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Volume manager window is not the right size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061 beland(a)alum.mit.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(beland(a)alum.mit.ed| |u) | ------- Additional Comments From beland(a)alum.mit.edu 2008-07-15 15:42 EST ------- gnome-media-2.22.0-2.fc9.x86_64 and gnome-media-2.22.0-2.fc9.i386 are installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage July 2008