[Bug 352061] nautilus shift-double-click is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: nautilus shift-double-click is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352061
poelstra(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|fedora-triage- |poelstra(a)redhat.com
|list(a)redhat.com |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|8 |9
------- Additional Comments From poelstra(a)redhat.com 2008-07-15 15:26 EST -------
changing version to 9 to reflect latest version problem has been seen
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 229054] pgadmin3: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: pgadmin3: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229054
poelstra(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO
Flag| |needinfo?(ghenry@suretecsyst
| |ems.com)
------- Additional Comments From poelstra(a)redhat.com 2008-07-15 15:25 EST -------
changing to needinfo re: comment #13
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 187302] X server crashes with "Active ring not flushed" while using Firefox
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: X server crashes with "Active ring not flushed" while using Firefox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187302
mcepl(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |F8-updates
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From mcepl(a)redhat.com 2008-07-15 13:05 EST -------
Of course you can. Or just adding a comment here should get to me as well.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767
------- Additional Comments From gdweber(a)indiana.edu 2008-07-15 12:25 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Shared library support should arrive in 6.10, so I propose to do nothing about
> this for another few months :-)
I guess that's fine. I'd like to report an update on the situation, and to
emphasize something in my earlier report.
******
The point I would like to emphasize is that building and installing
from source finishes in a reasonable amount of time, but installing from rpm
(yum) does not. Does that not suggest that something bizarre is happening
in the rpm install that does not happen in the install from source?
And since installing from source certainly generates the .o files, does that
not cast some doubt on the theory that, when the rpm generates the .o files
at install time, that's really the problem?
I realize that 256 MB RAM seems small to you guys, but it's all I've got --
and it's adequate for most things, including building and installing gtk2hs
from source, so why would it not be adequate for the rpm install?
******
Here's my update:
I've moved to a faster computer, but still with 256 MB RAM. Installed
Fedora 9. Tried to install ghc-gtk2hs, with the same results as I reported
before.
Downloaded the source tarball for gtk2hs 0.9.13 from
http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/download/
# ./configure --prefix=/opt --enable-cairo --enable-svg \
--enable-opengl
(Note, --enable-docs not included because that led to an installation failure
-- incompatible version of haddock, I think.)
# time make
-- completed in 25 minutes 37 seconds real time,
12 minutes 44 seconds user time, 5 minutes 29 seconds sys time,
with 2 Firefox processes running in the background
(one for root and one for another user)
# time make install
-- completed in 41 seconds
******
Summary:
1. rpm install of gtk2hs still does not work
2. rpm generating .o files at install time does not seem to be the problem,
since ...
3. ... install from source mostly* works, and does generate .o files
(*except for generating documentation).
4. Since I have something that works, if you want to wait for GHC 6.10,
before looking at it again, that's fine with me.
By the way, thanks for moving this bug to rawhide, since (I guess) that keeps it
alive after Fedora 7.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months