firewalld in atomic host
by Dusty Mabe
NOTE: if you respond to this message please 'reply-all'.
I'd like to discuss firewalld on atomic host. Recently I was trying to
figure out the best way to explain to other users how to set firewall rules
on atomic host.
Usually I would say add your rules and then iptables-save, but on Atomic
Host docker has added it's firewall rules in there dynamically so if you iptables-save
you'll get a bunch of stuff that you don't want in your static configuration.
There are ways around this; manually create your config file, or use iptables-save
and then rip the docker stuff out. Either way it's a bit of a pain. I think
firewalld would make this easier on the user. Not sure of the pro/con ratio though.
Thoughts?
Dusty
6 years, 1 month
[atomic-wg] Issue #229 `decide on version scheme and image naming scheme for
f26`
by Dusty Mabe
dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
We are now *releasing* OSTree content every two weeks rather than every night ([link](http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2017/02/matching-fedora-ostree-released-content-with-each-2week-atomic-release/)). Next we would like to make the image names that get produced reflect in some way the OSTree content that is baked into the image. During recent development @jlebon actually suggested that we use date based versions for Fedora Atomic Host: something like `version: 20170130.0`, `version: 20170130.1`, `version: 20170215.0`, etc...
Let's decide on what we want the versioning scheme to look like and also what the image names "could look like" as a result of this.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/229
6 years, 4 months