2:06 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Keywords: meeting
--------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
This will help things systemd to search the images provided by Fedora in a
standard way using nspawn tool.
Example of such file from ubuntu:
https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/SHA1SUMS
https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/SHA256SUMS.gpg
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
2:11 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by kushal):
Actually more on verifying the images from the checksums on a standard
path.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:1>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
8:27 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by lennart):
BTW, do keep this simple, let's just do SHA256SUMS, and nothing else. i.e.
no SHA1SUMS or so.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:2>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
2:07 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by roshi):
Is this what you're looking for?
https://getfedora.org/en/static/checksums/Fedora-Cloud-Images-
x86_64-21-CHECKSUM
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:3>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
12:25 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by lennart):
Well, yeah, but I want it under a fixed name, not something that changes
randomly in every dir.
I want the thing to be named "SHA256SUMS", not "Fedora-Cloud-
Images-....-CHECKSUM", so that I know what to download.
Also, I'd really prefer to have the signature in a detached file, like
Ubuntu is doing it. That has the benefit that we can first download the
SHA256SUMS file to do simple download verifications against corruptions,
and then download SHA256SUMS.sig seperately to actually verify that it is
signed by the right people.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:4>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
1:34 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by dustymabe):
I'm not going to advocate one way or the other as far as having attached
vs detached sig but I think it
should be fairly easy to have the tool parse the sum and the sig out of
the file and use them separately. This way we could accommodate systems
that use the ubuntu style and systems that use the fedora style.
I know leaving it the same would be easier on on releng and other tools
that already expect it to be this way. That being said we could easily
make it so that the file has a standard name.. We could leave Fedora-
Cloud-Images-x86_64-21-CHECKSUM in place and create a new file (symlink)
from SHA256SUMS -> Fedora-Cloud-Images-x86_64-21-CHECKSUM or something
like that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:5>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
3:02 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
An alternative (or additional?) approach might be to publish indexes in
the "simplestreams" format, as Ubuntu does. See for example https://cloud-
images.ubuntu.com/releases/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.cloud:released:download....
(or basically all the examples under https://cloud-
images.ubuntu.com/releases/streams/v1/).
(The format doesn't seem to be heavily documented anywhere, but here's
Ubuntu's lib: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:6>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
2:18 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: meeting |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by roshi):
* milestone: Fedora 22 => Future
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:7>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
2:23 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by roshi):
* keywords: meeting =>
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:8>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
4:25 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
FWIW,
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~smoser/simplestreams/trunk/view/head:/doc/RE...
documents the simplestreams format. Lennart, might this be something a
future systemd-nspawn could use?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:9>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
4:30 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
Oh, see also: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5805 (a request for
the virt-builder index.asc format).
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:10>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
5:52 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by lennart):
Replying to [comment:9 mattdm]:
FWIW,
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~smoser/simplestreams/trunk/view/head:/doc/RE...
documents the simplestreams format. Lennart, might this be something a
future systemd-nspawn could use?
These "simplestreams" stuff doesn't appear so simple to me ;-)
I think I like the concepts from the ACI spec better regarding image
discovery, but simple streams would work too, I don't care too much.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:11>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
7:34 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
Replying to [comment:11 lennart]:
These "simplestreams" stuff doesn't appear so simple to
me ;-)
To me either. :) Richard's ini-style index.asc files are much more human
readable, but the simplestreams format has among its advantages "already
widely in use for another big distro" and it seems like the best candidate
for eventually getting most everyone to do the same thing. I haven't
looked at the ACI discovery spec but I'll take a look.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:12>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
8:18 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by bkorren):
Any chance of seeing any sore of index file for the images soon?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:13>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
8:19 a.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by bkorren):
* cc: bkorren@… (added)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:14>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
12:06 p.m.
#93: Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: kushal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Infrastructure & Release Engineering | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by pbrobinson):
This should actually be filed as a RFE to pungi. That is the tool that
generates all the various release components and outputs the current
checksum format files. It's the proper place for a RFE to be filed that
would be actioned by rel-eng.
https://pagure.io/pungi
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93#comment:15>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
2898
days inactive
3398
days old
15 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets