On 07/25/2012 04:07 PM, Robert Kukura wrote:
On 07/25/2012 06:48 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
> <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> I think I'm in favour of keeping the 'openstack-' prefix on package
names too.
Is the plan to leave all the python code in the python-nova package,
with the openstack-* packages just adding init scripts, config, and
dependencies? Or is the python code being split up as well?
Ideally we would like to split out more from python-nova
into each of the sub packages, which I'll look into.
In quantum, the python-quantum package currently contains the
quantum
core python code, but the quantum plugin python code is in the
openstack-quantum-<plugin> subpackages.
Is the current quantum approach consistent with the proposed approach
for nova?
Yes. The more cohesive the packages the better,
irrespective of whether the components are code, config or whatever.
cheers,
Pádraig.