#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy -------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Resolution: Keywords: workstation | -------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by jwboyer):
Replying to [comment:27 mattdm]:
Also: I think we're mostly discussing nuances of what I called "the
second part". Aside from possible clarifications of phrasing, are all Council members okay with "part 1"? That is, something like:
The Fedora Council supports a third-party software policy that
conforms to Fedora's definition of free and open source software. The policy must require a distinction between Fedora-provided and third-party software that is clear to novice users. The selection and curation process for third-party software must be community-based and transparent.
?
Is anyone ''opposed'' to this?
I'm fine with this part of the proposal.