On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 07:01:36AM +0700, S.Kemter wrote:
> And, I think *some* FADs make sense from the central community
> (whether we call that the Council budget or something else), while
> others — like the ambassadors' planning FADs — make sense to me to be
> part of the regional budgets directly.
then they will not happen, they eat easily a third of the regional budget.
But there is still need for them.
Well, they have to be paid for _somehow_. I'm suggesting that it makes
sense to move that line item from the general pool to the regional
pool. Are you saying that if that happened, the regions would prefer to
spend that money in a different way and wouldn't do the planning
Fedora Project Leader