These were IMHO used for Transifex purpose. For us I think these lists
are more and less useless. IMHO we need governance list for issues,
one for translation (we have it - trans fpo), one for i18n for sure -
but do we need that much?
Zoltan
2016-08-25 8:35 GMT+02:00 pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com <pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com>:
On 25 August 2016 at 12:00, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
<jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can you please tell us what are the goald of those FAS group ?
>
> Translation CVS Commit Group (cvsl10n) -> Karsten Wade kwade(a)redhat.com
>
> l10n Commit Group (l10n-commits) -> Dimitris Glezos dimitris(a)glezos.com
>
> l10n Admin Group (l10n-admin) ->Dimitris Glezos dimitris(a)glezos.com
>
> Localization (L10n) Editors (l10n-editor) -> Diego Búrigo Zacarão
> diegobz(a)gmail.com
>
>
> if no answer in the next weeks, I will assume they are not in use anymore.
>
Perfect !!
* If groups are useful, we will change Admins.
* If groups not useful, simply disable/deactivate it.
Thanks,
Pravin
_______________________________________________
g11n mailing list
g11n(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
PGP: 06853DF7