On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:55 PM James Cassell fedoraproject@cyberpear.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek ttomecek@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline jeremy@jcline.org wrote:
We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea.
When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now.
I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your future plans for the git forge?
What the heck are you talking about? pagure.io is not going away anytime soon. And there will be other pagure instances that host source code that packit integration support would be useful for.
Hell, I've already offered to help with the pagure.io service.
The whole situation is bit unfortunate, as the announcement made it seem like pagure.io is going away. SSSD project just yesterday switched to Github from Pagure.
I hope to see Pagure continue doing great things, and I appreciate your involvement.
That's disappointing. On the flip side, the ironthree project (Rust clients and libraries for Fedora infrastructure) moved from GitHub to Pagure last week: https://pagure.io/projects/ironthree/%2A
I'm not moving Ipsilon to GitHub either.
-- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!