On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:12:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
There's no real technical reason why it can't be a tenant,
OSBS these
days is OpenShift namespace aware. However, from a Fedora Project
standpoint I expect we'll keep OSBS on it's own independent
installation because it's in the builder network within the Fedora
Infrastructure and therefore is quite locked down compared to what
people would expect out of a traditional OpenShift environment (for
example, containers don't have access to the outside Internet).
Could we do that lock-down with OpenShift multitenant features? Like:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/admin_guide/managing_po...
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader