On Nov 21, 2006, at 3:21 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>> Here they are in no particular order:
>> internal_comments -- this is always blank right now
>
> Is this one for sponsors or higher level people within the project to
> keep information about people like "Noticed that this account
> attempted
> to access internal infrastructure machines they don't have access to"
> "cvs access was revoked 11-17-2006 because they added "Buy v!@gr@" to
> the descriptions of twenty packages".
This can be done using the standard "description" attribute of the
inetOrgPerson schema.
FWIW, the original purpose of internal_comments was exactly what
Toshio said - to give group owners or account system administrators
the ability to keep notes that the user can't see, especially if
their access hasn't been approved yet. (At one point, I had it so
that you had to have your account approved, and not just access into
particular groups, and it made more sense then.)
Best,
-- Elliot