-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 7/17/20 6:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 02:56:08PM -0500, Brendan Early wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Timothée and I are working on fedora-packages-static. It's a lot simpler
> than the old packages app, it just generates static files that you can
> serve. The old packages app was missing packages and would time out if
> an external service took too long to respond. This approach eliminates
> those problems by not having the web server do that work on demand.
> Because these are just static files, search will need to be managed by
> something else (E.g. YaCy, Algolia). I have generated an example page
> and put a link below.
>
>
> Example:
>
https://mymindstorm.fedorapeople.org/pkgs-demo/pkgs/numix-icon-theme-square/
Yeah, and msuchy (and others) have been working on:
https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-packages-ng
My point is that we shouldn't have 2 groups working on the replacement,
that seems like it's taking time from one group we don't decide to use
the app from. Or is there a possibily to merge the two apps or split the
functionality up so both are complementary?
I didn't realize at the time that there were two solutions being
developed. Timothée was giving lots of status updates and you and
Clement were active in those discussions, so it wasn't very obvious from
my point of view as a fairly new contributor here. I don't know if it's
possible to merge the two. I don't see the point of spitting the
functionality as they mostly do the same thing.
Brendan Early
kevin
--
> Pagure:
https://pagure.io/fedora-packages-static
>
> --
>
> Brendan Early
>
> On 7/16/20 12:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> So, I think we have two groups approaching a replacement app for
>> packages?
>>
>> Can we perhaps decide which way we want to go and look at deploying
>> something soon? This has been more important since we didn't move the
>> old broken packages app from the old datacenter and people keep asking
>> about it.
>>
>> We could wait until we have staging back, but I don't think we need to
>> wait for that to decide what we want to do here?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> kevin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=hbr0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----