2010/12/9 Domingo Becker <domingobecker(a)gmail.com>:
2010/12/9 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:42:02 -0300
> Domingo Becker <domingobecker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you're right, it's sysadmin-web.
>> I'm new in fedora-admin and I'm working on ticket 2389, about
>> Transifex update.
>>
>> I have no problem to take care of Transifex once I get it updated.
>
> Cool. There are several other tickets related to it...
>
>> I'm currently stuck with the transifex package requirement of intltool
>> 0.37.1 or above.
>> CentOS 5.5 base repo has intltool 0.35.0 so I guess it would be faster
>> for Fedora to push an update to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing repo.
>
> Not possible I'm afraid.
>
> EPEL never ships anything thats part of the base OS.
>
Oops
>> I asked Matthias Lasen (mclasen), the intltool package maintainer,
>> about the possibility to push an update to Fedora EPEL 5. I'm still
>> waiting for an answer.
>
> He's likely not going to be able to help.
> You would need to get the RHEL maintainer (whoever that is) to push
> such an update. I suspect they would have very strong resistance to
> doing so in a stable release. ;(
>
I tested in CentOS 5.5 with a package for F10.
But I did that by hand.
Doing that would be like cheating!
And it may be not acceptable by some internal policy.
I thought of the install to be as easy as doing a
yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing transifex
I have all packages in place now, except intltool. :-(
Who maintains intltool in RHEL5?
Perhaps asking...
If the package may not reach RHEL5 updates-testing, I guess we may use
the fedora-admin repo for this exception.
Is it possible?