8:54 a.m.
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the reply, but please be a bit more specific. In the link you
provided me, at what section of the page I am supposed to look for the
solutions to the problems I encountered ? Please tell me, I really want to
learn.
And, as you can see from my post, I own two different set of systems (a
Desktop PC and a Lenovo laptop) which can be used for testing purposes, so
can I be of any assisstance to the Fedora Developer team ? As a novice, this
is the best way I can participate in the development of FC and learn in the
process too.
As far as my educational background is concerned, I completed B-Tech in
Computer Science & Engineering (CSE)in 2006, an equivalent to US based four
year BS Computer Engineering program. I am good at programming in C and core
Java. I am currently applying for MS Computer Science program in US
Universities for the Fall 2008 session.
I really want to learn and apply my creative skills effectively. So, if I
can in any way participate in the development of Fedora Core, please let me
know. Thanks and regards,
Cyberbob
Alt. Email: cyberbob24(a)indiatimes.com
On Jan 8, 2008 10:30 PM, <fedora-infrastructure-list-request(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Send Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fedora-infrastructure-list-request(a)redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-infrastructure-list-owner(a)redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Fedora-infrastructure-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. I am having a peculiar problem (Cyber Bob)
2. Re: I am having a peculiar problem (Mike McGrath)
3. FC6 guests (Luke Macken)
4. Re: FC6 guests (Matt Domsch)
5. the syncmail script (Mike McGrath)
6. Re: the syncmail script (Jeremy Katz)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Cyber Bob" <cyberbob24(a)gmail.com>
To: fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:43:25 +0530
Subject: I am having a peculiar problem
Hi,
I am an user of Fedora Core since 2003, and I've used versions 1.0 and 6.0.
Though I've used both versions for quite some time now, I would still like
to consider myself to be a novice, since Linux is still like a mysterious
lady to me :).
I am facing three peculiar problems with FC6 in two systems:
1. I own an Intel D865GBF based PC running an Intel 2.8 GHz processor with
512 MB MB (dual channel) DDR RAM. It houses two Seagate Baracuda 80 GB HDDs.
FC6 was installed in a dual boot environment with WinXP, FC6 was installed
in three primary partitions in the second HDD. Now the problem was that,
whenever I tried to boot into FC6, system hanged at the "loading udev" line.
I traced the source of this problem to be kernel-xen; since the problem
vanished as soon as I unchecked the "Virtualisation" segment in all of the
fresh installations post problem. I observed that it installed only "kernel"
and not "kernel-xen". Can anyone please tell me whether my observations are
correct or not, and whether there exists any solution to the problem with
"kernel-xen" ?
2. I own a Lenovo 3000 Y500 notebook with 512 MB DDR RAM and 120 GB HDD.
FC6 is installed in a dual boot environment with Win Vista that came
preloaded. As soon as I update kernel, from the next boot onwards, the
updated kernel is unable to detect the laptop keyboard whereas the default
kernel works fine. The problem persisted even after updating hal, cups,
seliux-policy targeted and xorg-x11. Am I doing something wrong ? The same
setup seems to work fine in my PC.
3. Even after installing the latest JDK and JRE, the latest version of
OpenOffice.org components fails to start even after giving a "installation
success". I didn't installed the following bundled products: OpenOffice,
Java, Java runtime, eclipse, firefox and thunderbird. I installed the latest
releases of the above mentioned softwares from their respective sites. Any
solutions ?
Please give me a reply as soon as possible. I am eager to become a part of
the FC6 Developers team, but before doing so I need to upgrade myself from
novice status. For now, I would like to observe things and explore the way
things work here. Wish me luck.
Wishing you all a very happy prosperous new year, regards,
Cyberbob (A)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com>
To: fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:20:58 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: I am having a peculiar problem
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Cyber Bob wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am an user of Fedora Core since 2003, and I've used versions 1.0 and
6.0.
> Though I've used both versions for quite some time now, I would still
like
> to consider myself to be a novice, since Linux is still like a
mysterious
> lady to me :).
>
> I am facing three peculiar problems with FC6 in two systems:
>
> 1. I own an Intel D865GBF based PC running an Intel 2.8 GHz processor
with
> 512 MB MB (dual channel) DDR RAM. It houses two Seagate Baracuda 80 GB
HDDs.
> FC6 was installed in a dual boot environment with WinXP, FC6 was
installed
> in three primary partitions in the second HDD. Now the problem was that,
> whenever I tried to boot into FC6, system hanged at the "loading udev"
line.
> I traced the source of this problem to be kernel-xen; since the problem
> vanished as soon as I unchecked the "Virtualisation" segment in all of
the
> fresh installations post problem. I observed that it installed only
"kernel"
> and not "kernel-xen". Can anyone please tell me whether my observations
are
> correct or not, and whether there exists any solution to the problem
with
> "kernel-xen" ?
>
> 2. I own a Lenovo 3000 Y500 notebook with 512 MB DDR RAM and 120 GB HDD.
FC6
> is installed in a dual boot environment with Win Vista that came
preloaded.
> As soon as I update kernel, from the next boot onwards, the updated
> kernel is unable to detect the laptop keyboard whereas the default
kernel
> works fine. The problem persisted even after updating hal, cups,
> seliux-policy targeted and xorg-x11. Am I doing something wrong ? The
same
> setup seems to work fine in my PC.
>
> 3. Even after installing the latest JDK and JRE, the latest version of
> OpenOffice.org components fails to start even after giving a
"installation
> success". I didn't installed the following bundled products: OpenOffice,
> Java, Java runtime, eclipse, firefox and thunderbird. I installed the
latest
> releases of the above mentioned softwares from their respective sites.
Any
> solutions ?
>
> Please give me a reply as soon as possible. I am eager to become a part
of
> the FC6 Developers team, but before doing so I need to upgrade myself
from
> novice status. For now, I would like to observe things and explore the
way
> things work here. Wish me luck.
>
> Wishing you all a very happy prosperous new year, regards,
Sorry Cyber Bob, you want:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-Mike
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luke Macken <lmacken(a)redhat.com>
To: fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:23:25 -0500
Subject: FC6 guests
So, we still have a handful of FC6 guests lying around in PHX.
After a quick look, it seems that we're using them for the following
services.
publictest1
- pkgdb-dev
- ns-slapd
- mysqld
- postgres
- wevisor
publictest2
- my mash/bodhi playground
publictest4
- asterisk
test1
- security irc bot / xmlrpc.
Please feel free to chime in with any services / guests I'm missing.
With regard to publictest2, this guest can go away and not come back.
I'd be fine doing mash/bodhi testing on any guest that has a couple gigs
of RAM and read-only access to /mnt/koji.
So, in order to get this ball rolling, we need to determine which guests
we want to upgrade / destroy, what OS we want to upgrade them to, and if
the
services are currently able to run on that OS. Also, when would the best
time
to upgrade be?
luke
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch(a)dell.com>
To: fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:26:59 -0600
Subject: Re: FC6 guests
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:23:25AM -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> So, we still have a handful of FC6 guests lying around in PHX.
> After a quick look, it seems that we're using them for the following
> services.
>
> publictest1
> - pkgdb-dev
> - ns-slapd
> - mysqld
> - postgres
> - wevisor
I use pt1 for some mirrormanager hacking, but that can be done on any
system now, and I have nothing valuable on there, so it can go away at
any time from my POV.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com>
To: fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:29:43 -0600 (CST)
Subject: the syncmail script
I know there's a lot of history around the syncmail script, does anyone
know why we don't just stick a & at the end and fork it?
I'm refering to the ctl+c to skip notifications issue.
-Mike
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com>
To: fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:39:41 -0500
Subject: Re: the syncmail script
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 10:29 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I know there's a lot of history around the syncmail script, does anyone
> know why we don't just stick a & at the end and fork it?
>
> I'm refering to the ctl+c to skip notifications issue.
>From what I remember, we tried this and it didn't work
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list