Re: Proposal: Add a separate “flatpaks/” namespace.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:28:51PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
* Reduce some confusion. A Flatpak is a module, but it’s *also* a
container, and the dist-git repository will include files for both.
I'm +1 to this for this reason. I think it's less confusing than the
downside loose-module confusion. :)
In related news, I'm killing the rawtherapee "loose-rpm" module and just
making a flatpak one.
Question: would this open up the possiblity of offering different _flatpak_
streams? I'd like to have a stream where the rc releases are built so people
who want to try those can.
* We should probably move flatpak-common to the flatpaks/ namespace
for ease of discovery, but it isn’t in any way a flatpak, it’s just a
module that Flatpaks can depend on.
I'd suggest just making a flatpak-common repo in flatpaks/ with a README
linking to the module namespace.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader