On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 10:27 -0700, Ryan Ordway wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 19:05 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On 8/24/06, seth vidal <skvidal(a)linux.duke.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 16:48 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 19:40 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > 2. are the newer versions of those packages in fc5 not workable for
us?
> > > >
> > > Some things like python had major version upgrades between fc3 and fc5.
> > > At minimum, we would have to rebuild the fc5 packages on fc3 to account
> > > for this. Some fc5 packages won't function with the older version at
> > > all (such as bzr).
> >
> > true. But the first thing to get a handle on is what we need to be
> > taking care of.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > 3. If fedora extras cvs started making it possible for us to build
and
> > > > release RHEL/Centos 4 packages is anyone interested in helping
maintain
> > > > a branch for that distro?
> > > >
> > > I can help maintain a branch for things we're working with in
> > > infrastructure. I don't run RHEL or Centos here, though.
> >
> > we have configs for mock for centos.
> >
> > So you can easily build the package in there. I build some almost
> > everyday.
> >
> >
> > -sv
>
> I'll go ahead and ask the question. If I proposed a Fedora Project
> called Fedora Enterprise or Fedora Enterprise Extras who here would
> help me maintain it?
I can help. I run both RHEL 4 and CentOS 4 on x86 and soon on amd64.
> We could then merge Z00dax's current infrastructure and work with some
> of Fedora's stuff. With quaid's help we might get some support/buy-in
> from inside Red Hat. Operating completely independently of Extras or
> with them. Perhaps one of the branch requests could be "RHEL4" or
> "FEE4". (I'm not sure about how RH would feel about Fedora producing
> RH branded packages). We can open it up to extras maintainers and
> follow the same lifecycle of whatever branch we're creating. I'd be
> happy to write up some guidelines do the administrative tasks and all
> the overhead that would come along with a project like this. I'm not
> kidding myself, this is a lot of work but, IMHO, I think there's a
> real market out there not just inside of the FP Infrastructure.
Hell yeah, I would love to be able to get "extras" for RHEL and CentOS.
And I'm sure there are boatloads of other people that would as well.
Then help on the enterprise extras project that quaid (on irc) is trying
to get rolling.
please!
-sv