On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:56:26 +0200
Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/10/2015 06:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I think it might be a good idea to have some swift space setup, but
> I am not sure what use cases we fully have for it, so I would say it
> should be somewhat small. 100GB or something?
> This would also be backed by the equalogics? Or would it be
> distributed on the nodes?
Swift have built-in split/replica mechanism. So I think that with
this size, I can steal some space from vg_server of nodes.
Yeah. Or perhaps somewhat bigger would make sense? 500G?
> Are there specific cases where live migrations would help us out
a
> lot?
I do not know. Cold migration last several minutes. I agree that we
can afford it. We are not bank or stock operator where every outage
cost pile of money.
Yeah. The one place I thought might be nice was if we wanted to reboot
a compute node to update it, but then I got to thinking, why shouldn't
we also just reboot the instances too and update them as well? ;)
kevin