On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk
<puiterwijk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Comment inline below.
I think aarch64 should be up with the ['x86_64', 'armhfp',
'source'] list now
Right, imagine that I've done that. (lines of patch following).
+ 'to': [{'arches': ['x86_64',
'aarch64', 'armhfp', 'source'],
+ 'dest': os.path.join(FEDORADEST,
'testing', '28', 'Everything')},
+ {'arches': ['i386', 'ppc64',
'ppc64le', 's390x'],
+ 'dest': os.path.join(FEDORAALTDEST,
'testing', '28', 'Everything')}
+ ]}}
...
+ 'to': [{'arches': ['x86_64',
'aarch64', 'armhfp', 'source'],
+ 'dest': os.path.join(FEDORADEST,
'testing', '28', 'Modular')},
+ {'arches': ['i386', 'ppc64',
'ppc64le', 's390x'],
+ 'dest': os.path.join(FEDORAALTDEST,
'testing', '28', 'Modular')}
]}}
>
>
> Same here.
>
> > - 'dest': os.path.join(FEDORAALTDEST,
> > 'testing', '28')}
> > + 'dest': os.path.join(FEDORAALTDEST,
> > 'testing', '28', 'Modular')}
> > ]}}
> > },
> > 'f27': {'topic': 'fedora',
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list --
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >