Is there an ETA for the next vacuum process? If we can wait for some
months it might worth to upgrade to newer rhel and postgres after dc
migration but before next autovacuum process instead of lowering now the
max age and forcing another autovacuum process with current old postgres
20/3/4 09:41(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 22:39, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com
> <mailto:kevin@scrye.com>> wrote:
>
> And our lazyness and indecision pays off!
>
> The autovac is finally done and load should be back to normal.
>
>
> Should we lower down the autovacuum max age ? so that next times it runs
> it does not take that long ?
>
>
> I am going to re-enable backups.
>
> Thanks everyone.
>
> kevin
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list --
> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
>