On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
<sochotnicky(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Andy Grimm's message of Fri Sep 02 20:42:49 +0200
2011:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jack Tanner <ihok(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > There's apparently precedent for bundling POMs:
> >
> >
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2504
>
> Yes there are precedents; in fact, I found (after starting this
> thread) that the geronimo-parent-poms package in F16 contains POMs
> related to genesis, but uses the 1.5 POMs rather than 2.0, so the
> "flava" POMs aren't included. Could geronimo-parent-poms be updated
> to 2.0 ?
So this doesn't get lost: file a bug in the bugzilla. I'll update it. I
assume you'd like to have this also in F16, correct?
Yes. I have filed this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736161
> And as for apache-parent, somehow even though org.apache:apache is
> referenced as a parent in numerous fedora-packaged POMs on my system,
> it's not packaged anywhere that I could see. I didn't think the child
> POMs were functional without the parent, but I guess I have
> misunderstood this. Still, it seems reasonable to have apache-parent
> packaged.
You were correct in thinking that parent poms are required. We have it
in package maven2-common-poms. This is one ugly pom-only package that
used to contain 100s of POM files. We cut it down significantly, but
there are still things in there. If you create a new parent package,
that is currently contained in maven2-common-poms either file a bug to
have old POM removed or ping me on IRC and I'll do it.
I see, I just didn't find the right directory of POMs. I have created
apache-parent and filed a review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=736069
I noted in the review request that the old POM should be removed from
maven2-common-poms once this package is released.
> --Andy
>
> > On 9/2/2011 2:01 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> >> The way that the POMs for the apache ecosystem are structured, it
> >> looks like I'm going to need to package several levels of
"parent"
> >> POMs. Something like:
> >>
> >> apache-parent
> >> genesis-parent
> >> genesis-default-flava
> >> genesis-java5-flava
> >>
> >> Should each pom be separate, or is there a point at which it makes
> >> sense to group some set of "apache-parent-poms" together? I can
go
> >> either way with it, but I want to put these up for review fairly soon,
> >> and didn't want to file a bunch of separate reviews if they should all
> >> just be bundled in a single package.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --Andy
> >> --
> >> java-devel mailing list
> >> java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > java-devel mailing list
> > java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
> >
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel