On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:59 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Anthony Green <green(a)redhat.com> [2005-07-05 17:58]:
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:38 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > * Anthony Green <green(a)redhat.com> [2005-07-05 17:24]:
> > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 16:57 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > > > > I look into submitting it to extras. [...]
> >
> > On second thought, should we ship this or classpath-javadoc?
>
> Why would it make sense to ship classpath javadoc? We don't ship
> classpath.
I know. I think this should go into the gcc RPM and not as a standalone
package.
Oh, right - I agree.
I wrote this package after we started hearing about the FC4 size
problems. I would have submitted a GCC spec file patch to Jakub
otherwise.
AG