Blojsom and Tomcat on FC4

[David J. Orme]

Hi all,

Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed with
FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It bombed with
an error in the log file about a malformed regular expression.

What is the correct place to report this bug?

Best regards,

Dave Orme

[Tom Tromey]

> > > > > "David" == David J Orme  writes:

David> Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed with
David> FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It bombed with
David> an error in the log file about a malformed regular expression.

David> What is the correct place to report this bug?
> From the sound of it, either Classpath's bug tracker on savannah, or

gcc bugzilla (either is fine, sometime soon these should be merged).

However in general I think it is fine to report bugs to the Red Hat
bugzilla.  Sometimes they might be RH specific; and we can push them
upstream after investigation.  (This particular one is almost
certainly an upstream bug.)

Tom

[Ziga Mahkovec]

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 14:32 -0500, David J. Orme wrote:
> Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed with
> FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It bombed with
> an error in the log file about a malformed regular expression.

You're probably seeing the same problem Anthony reported some time ago:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435

I sent a classpath patch for review; the attached patch against blojsom
should also do the trick.  After applying it, blojsom seems to work fine
-- at least for the obligatory screenshot :)

http://bootchart.org/misc/blojsom-gcj.png

[Gary Benson]

Ziga Mahkovec wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 14:32 -0500, David J. Orme wrote:
> > Today I tried to get Blojsom to run inside Tomcat as distributed
> > with FC4 test3 (with all updates applied as-of this morning).  It
> > bombed with an error in the log file about a malformed regular
> > expression.
>
> You're probably seeing the same problem Anthony reported some time ago:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20435
>
> I sent a classpath patch for review; the attached patch against
> blojsom should also do the trick.  After applying it, blojsom seems
> to work fine -- at least for the obligatory screenshot :)
>
> http://bootchart.org/misc/blojsom-gcj.png

That's cool :D