On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Jane Dogalt wrote:
This seems clear, in that leaving the fedora name in the graphical
boot
sequence is in my mind _implicit_ association. As opposed to putting an
iso on a website and saying "this is fedora linux: jdog live version",
which would be _explicit_ association.
But if my interpretation there is correct, then it doesn't seem there is an
actual need for the post-install cleanup script mentioned below (there is no
need, but it still might be a nice option).
So Greg, can you clear it up for me? Can I install mp3 support, rewrite
the bootscripts so that they work for me, but generally make the distro
look broken and like a piece of crap for most other people because I
didn't invest any time quality-controlling my changes, leaving in the
fedora graphics during graphical boot and default desktop background,
and then post the iso as jdog.iso advertised as "jane dogalt's live OS"?
Would it make any difference if in addition to the above, on my website, I
called the distribution a "livecd derived from fedora core 5"?
What's clearly required is a definition of "using the Fedora marks."
I will get a *very* explicit definition from legal, using your points as
reference.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project ||
fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador ||
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------