Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] Kadischi - USB fork?
--- Jasper O'neal Hartline <jasperhartline(a)adelphia.net> wrote:
Filip Tsachev wrote:
> I guess this fork has the potential to utilise different concept as
> it's RW media.
>
No. SquashFS is still read-only filesystem.
As you mentioned, it isn't that different (in some manifestations) from the
kadischi output. Thus why fork instead of just making it a kadischi feature?
Certainly you would work in your own tree until you've got a clean feature
addition patch, but forking doesn't make sense IMO. Certainly kadischi should
handle usb sticks as gracefully (or hopefully more gracefully) than knoppix,
and a live-usb is just like sticking your livecd in the stick.
I'm guessing using a fairly static ROM image might be better anyway as a lot of
flash wouldn't hold up that well to frequent small writes (if it was used as a
generic rw fs)
my 0.02...
-jdog
J. Hartline
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
Fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com