On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Skunk Worx wrote:
From an end user perspective, I'd like to see a final word on the
Kadischi project stating that kadischi users can make isos and keep
Fedora logos and trademarks intact...even when we include our
proprietary kernel drivers and software.
So noted. I think we'd all like some way of distinguishing between
"official Fedora" and "based on Fedora," and we're just trying to
figure
out the best way to do that.
We put our own software and drivers under /usr on the DVDs and your
logos are plainly visible. In the past we have been proud to say we use
Fedora for development and release. A lot of people have tried Fedora
after seeing our demos. Does Fedora treat a bootable hard drive image
and a bootable iso differently?
When are you going to enforce on hard drives? I have the NVIDIA driver
and the euro MP3 package added to my home machine...as well as a bunch
of proprietary. Do I have to remove all your logos from my hard drive
install?
Of course not. On your machine, you can do anything you want.
Why is the iso so different? Are you planning to use DRM to insure
only
core/extras are installed if logos and trademarks are present?
Because the ISO is for redistribution. These guidelines are all about
"what you can redistribute and still call it Fedora."
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project ||
fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador ||
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------