f8 gripe#2: why did f8's pm-hibernate regress?

[Douglas McClendon]

Can someone tell me if there is anything I can do to de-regress f8's 
pm-hibernate?

What I mean is that it seems like in f7, pm-hibernate saved the kernel 
buffer/filesystem caches as well as the minimal needed stuff.  Now in 
f8, every time I resume, system performance is crap because everything 
needs to be read piecemeal from disk into the caches again.

My analysis is pure speculation based on my understanding of how you can 
tune that behaviour with suspend2(tux-on-ice).  But it is very noticable 
and very annoying and very clearly a f7->f8 change.

-dmc

please disregard (wrong list) f8 gripe#2: why did f8's pm-hibernate regress?

[Douglas McClendon]

I wasn't paying close enough attention to my thunderbird tab completion, 
this mail was meant for fedora-devel.

Douglas McClendon wrote:
>  Can someone tell me if there is anything I can do to de-regress
> f8's 
>  pm-hibernate?
>  
>  What I mean is that it seems like in f7, pm-hibernate saved the kernel 
>  buffer/filesystem caches as well as the minimal needed stuff.  Now in 
>  f8, every time I resume, system performance is crap because everything 
>  needs to be read piecemeal from disk into the caches again.
>  
>  My analysis is pure speculation based on my understanding of how you can 
>  tune that behaviour with suspend2(tux-on-ice).  But it is very noticable 
>  and very annoying and very clearly a f7->f8 change.
>  
>  -dmc
>  
>  -- 
>  Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
>  Fedora-livecd-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list