Thinking about the success criteria, I'd propose to just look back at the month, try to answer the following questions, and then the editorial board would do a majority vote based on that.
1/ Have we attracted new contributors in the forum that weren't on the list? 2/ Having the proposals together with the discussion, was it faster to approve proposals? 3/ Was it faster for people to get responses in general? 4/ Do you like the experience better? less? same?
As for the dates, yes, we've decided to move this a week, meaning:
Thursday 18 June — Switch to the forum Week of 20 July — Evaluate, vote, and either stay or go back
What do people think? And does anyone have some additional (better?) success criteria to add?
Cheers! Adam
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:27 PM Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com wrote:
In today's meeting, we agreed to delay the Discourse trial by a week in order for asamalik to have time to drive the "success criteria" conversation.
-- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@lists.fedoraproject.o...