Thinking about the success criteria, I'd propose to just look back at the
month,
try to answer the following questions, and then the editorial board would do
a majority vote based on that.
1/ Have we attracted new contributors in the forum that weren't on the list?
2/ Having the proposals together with the discussion, was it faster to
approve proposals?
3/ Was it faster for people to get responses in general?
4/ Do you like the experience better? less? same?
As for the dates, yes, we've decided to move this a week, meaning:
Thursday 18 June — Switch to the forum
Week of 20 July — Evaluate, vote, and either stay or go back
What do people think? And does anyone have some additional (better?)
success criteria to add?
Cheers!
Adam
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:27 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
In today's meeting, we agreed to delay the Discourse trial by a
week
in order for asamalik to have time to drive the "success criteria"
conversation.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@lists.fedoraprojec...
--
Adam Šamalík
---------------------------
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat