10:29 a.m.
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
[root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org
Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets
Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max
1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms
6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms
8 * * *
9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms
great, does wget work for you? I can test from a bunch of other places,
but I suspect it's going to work for me from everywhere I look...
pls try your download again.
-Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
> traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms
> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms
> 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms
> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
[morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 14:46:38--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
0.9s
2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
`gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
so... 'works for me!' ??
> 8 * * *
> 9 * * *
> 10 * * *
> 11 * * *
> 12 * * *
> 13 * * *
> 14 * * *
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
> Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
> To: Chris Morrow
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch"
<Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
> inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
> Memory:fc000000-fc020000
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
>
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>
>> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at
home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>>
>> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07
10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply]
>>
>> Description of problem:
>>
>> Downloading Packages:
>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
>> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
>>
>>
>> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
>> Fedora 10 x86_64
>>
>> How reproducible:
>> Everytime since last few days
>>
>> Steps to Reproduce:
>> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
>> 2.
>> 3.
>>
>> Actual results:
>> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>>
>> Expected results:
>> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
>> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>>
>> Additional info:
>> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
>> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Domsch
>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>