On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:14:56PM -0600, Selene Scriven wrote:
I tried setting nm_record=yes, but ended up getting strange
behavior from it. Messages sent that way seem to end up being
totally invisible to mutt-kz. Am I doing something wrong?
I can still see the messages if I look via Maildir or 'notmuch
search', but I haven't figured out a way to find them via
notmuch+mutt-kz.
$ notmuch search nm_record
thread:0000000000045790 19 mins. ago [1/1] Selene Scriven; # nm_record is commented out
(archive new)
thread:000000000004578f 21 mins. ago [1/1] Selene Scriven; nm_record=no (inbox new)
thread:000000000004578e 22 mins. ago [1/1] Selene Scriven; nm_record=yes (archive me)
But here is what I see in mutt-kz:
notmuch:///home/selene/mail?query=nm_record - (threads) [new=0+0/47,post=37] [2/2]
1 F 13-11-01 To selene@toykee (0.1K) # nm_record is commented out {arch new}
2 F 13-11-01 To selene@toykee (0.1K) nm_record=no {in new}
Any idea how to make the missing message show up in mutt-kz?
nm_record = yes
forces mutt-kz to add sent messages to nomtmuch DB, if
nm_record_tags = <list of the tags>
are specified than the tags are also used for the messages. So if
you want to see the messages, you have to use the tags in the query:
For example I use:
nm_record = yes
nm_record_tags = -inbox me archive
and URI
notmuch:///home/kzak/Mail/Maildir/?query=tag:me
returns all the messages.
For example (Esc)X, command vfolder-from-query, for string "tag:me".
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak(a)redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com