ppc64le: c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
by Sérgio Basto
Hello ppc list ,
I don't know where I should report this issue, if this is not the
correct place, please tell me where it is, thanks.
I can't build opencv-3.1 on ppc64le the builds always ends with :
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:36678: Warning: end of file not at end of a line;
newline inserted
{standard input}:39048: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.l295'
{standard input}: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing
.cfi_endproc directive
c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
make[2]: ***
[modules/cvv/CMakeFiles/opencv_cvv.dir/src/view/rawview.cpp.o] Error 4
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Build logs:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/build/183181/
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora-
23-ppc64le/00183181-opencv/build.log.gz
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora-
rawhide-ppc64le/00181899-opencv/build.log.gz
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
4 years, 8 months
- 4
- 7
PowerPC g5 Later(2005)
by Rino Rondan
Hi,
Im trying to install Fedora 27 in my PowerPc but I can not boot it, I tested ubuntu and booted ok with yaboot, also tested openbsd and freebsd with openfirwmare boot. I saw this link https://github.com/masterzorag/G5_ppc64-linux but I can not replicate it or I did not understand why so many steps and why iso will not work for him.
I have problem with Nvidia driver in all tested distros... Any experience or recomendation ? Im user of Fedora about more than 8 years but I see for ppc64 some distros have less packages than others...
Regards
---
Rondan Rino
[Certificado en LPIC-3 ](https://cs.lpi.org/caf/Xamman/certification)
LPI ID:LPI000209832
Verification Code:gbblvwyfxu
[Red Hat Certified Engineer -- RHCE -- RHCVA](https://www.redhat.com/rhtapps/certification/verify/?certId=120-17...
Phone:+1210 888 0738
Blog:[http://www.itrestauracion.com.ar](http://www.itrestauracion.com.ar/)
Cv:[ http://cv.rinorondan.com.ar](http://www.rinorondan.com.ar/)
[http://counter.li.org](http://counter.li.org/) Linux User -> #517918
Viva La Santa Federacion!!
Mueran Los Salvages Unitarios!!
^^^Transcripcion de la epoca ^^^
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in Switzerland.
5 years, 9 months
- 4
- 15
Fwd: Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization
by Florian Weimer
FYI.
Please participate in the discussion on the devel list, as you see fit.
Thanks,
Florian
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:07:40 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Should we start compiling Fedora with auto-vectorization, either using
-O3 or -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize?
Downstream experimented with that for POWER 7 (the ppc64p7 packages).
But if auto-vectorization is beneficial on POWER, it likely helps on
other CPUs as well, given that SIMD support is quite common nowadays.
I really want to avoid a package-specific flag because I don't think
discussions about per-package build policies are a good use of our time,
and dependency changes invalidate previous decisions based on package
use all the time. (We saw a lot of that when we still had
package-specific hardening flags.)
We currently have the RPM macro _performance_build for that: It's used
in some Fedora spec files, but the redhat-rpm-config support have never
be contributed to Fedora. If we enable auto-vectorization globally,
those packages could remove the _performance_build setting, a minor cleanup.
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
5 years, 9 months
- 1
- 0
- ← Newer
- 1
- Older →