On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Adam Miller
<maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:36:46 -0500
> Adam Miller <maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>> Hot off the heals of my email to start a conversation about what
>> all it's going to take to get the Fedora Rel-Eng Staging environment
>> up and running again[0] I wanted to make a proposal for a new way to
>> manage projects that can be broken down into small consumable "units
>> of work" much in line with kanban[1].
>
> Note that many of these topics would be good for a meeting/more
> interactive discussion, IMHO. ;)
+1 - How do I request something be put on the Rel-Eng meeting agenda
for next week?
>
>> Proposal:
>> Projects would be planned in the open in irc meetings (logged with
>> meetbot) and documented in the wiki for general overview and
>> posterity, from there this is broken down into specific units of work
>> that can be tracked and picked up (hopefully) by any interested member
>> of the Rel-Eng team.
>
> Well, the wiki is kind of horrible for planning things. It might work,
> but it's much easier for a wiki page to start growing moss and decaying
> than a trac ticket IMHO. So, I would suggest trac (or whatever
> ticketing system) instead of wiki for projects.
That's fair, I'm open to any solution that the group prefers. I mostly
suggested the wiki because it's the only collaborative document
editing platform I know of inside the Fedora Infrastructure.
>
>> I like to think this will make the process of
>> work transparent to the broader community as well as offer an
>> approachable avenue for new Rel-Eng team members to join in allowing
>> them to select low-hanging-fruit type units of work to use as learning
>> experiences.
>> Also, the details of this project planning workflow (whatever it
>> ends up being) would be documented in the Fedora wiki such that it
>> could be used as part of an "on-boarding" document for community
>> members interested in joining the Fedora Rel-Eng team.
>
> Sure, that sounds great.
>
>> My hope here is to introduce a new piece of infrastructure to fill
>> this requirement that provides a kanban-style board of cards much like
>> Trello[2] but using a FOSS solution that we can host ourselves. For
>> this I'd like to propose the use of Cantas[3]. (This part would likely
>> need a request sent to Fedora Infrastructure team unless we're fine
>> just hosting it somewhere like OpenShift Online).
>>
>> Questions, comments and general snide remarks welcome! :)
>
> As mentioned in a followup, it would need to get packaged up, etc if we
> want to host one.
>
It's been packaged upstream[0], I'll reach out to upstream and find
out if they're interested in submitting to Fedora for Package Review.
Looks like someone beat me to the punch, I added a comment and will
follow along:
https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas/issues/65
-AdamM
One other thing to note is we might need to contribute a patch
upstream for an auth plugin to integrate with FAS, I'll try to find
some time to dig into that a little in the near future.
-AdamM
[0] -
https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas/blob/master/nodejs-cantas.spec
> kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> rel-eng mailing list
> rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/rel-eng