On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:58:34 -0400
"Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:25:36AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:36:46 -0500
> Adam Miller <maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > Hot off the heals of my email to start a conversation about
> > what all it's going to take to get the Fedora Rel-Eng Staging
> > environment up and running again[0] I wanted to make a proposal
> > for a new way to manage projects that can be broken down into
> > small consumable "units of work" much in line with kanban[1].
>
> Note that many of these topics would be good for a meeting/more
> interactive discussion, IMHO. ;)
Good point. Sounds like we should pull one together -- at least with
Adam (obviously), reps from rel-eng, infrastructure, apps side, and a
program manager if possible. I think Matthew would likely also want
to attend; I definitely would.
Do we have enough interest that I should set up a whenisgood for this?
well, I was just suggesting a releng meeting. Are they at a time where
all those people would be unable to attend?
If we're talking about rel-eng stuff, it seems like a good idea
to use
that Trac for visibility rather than a separate one. Maybe a new
component is needed? Don't want to get bikesheddy here, just trying
to avoid a disconnect.
Sure. I again personally don't care, as long as the people doing the
work are happy with something.
We just had a new addition to our kernel team who is dogfooding that
team's wiki information to find out what we need to fix for
contributors. Seems like this is somewhat an opportunity for the
same?
Having team and workflow details out of date on the wiki, and having
few contributors, are sort of a "vicious cycle" problem. Breaking the
cycle with some better docs is a great idea.
Absolutely.
kevin