rawhide report: 20070526 changes
by Build System
Updated Packages:
anaconda-11.2.0.66-1
--------------------
* Fri May 25 2007 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> - 11.2.0.66-1
- fix dhcp netconfig in DVD-based rescue mode or repo adding (dcantrell)
gnome-pilot-2.0.15-3.fc7
------------------------
* Fri Dec 01 2006 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> - 2.0.15-3.fc7
- Remove patch for GNOME bug #362565 (fixed upstream).
* Mon Nov 27 2006 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> - 2.0.15-2.fc7
- Rebuild against pilot-link-0.12.
* Fri Nov 24 2006 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> - 2.0.15-1.fc7
- Update to 2.0.15
smolt-0.9.8.1-1.fc7
-------------------
* Thu May 24 2007 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> - 0.9.8.1
- Upstream released new version
* Sun Apr 22 2007 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> - 0.9.7.1-3
- Added smolt icons
* Tue Apr 17 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff(a)ocjtech.us> - 0.9.6-4
- Add standard scriptlets in pre & post to handle init script - fixes #236776
- Use the find_lang macro to find/mark translations.
17 years
Fedora 7 RC Live images available via torrent
by Jeremy Katz
RC of the Fedora 7 Live image set (i686, x86_64, i686 KDE and x86_64
KDE) are now available at http://torrent.fedoraproject.org.
Note that the i686 images require an i686 class machine and should be
able to be burned on 700 meg CD images.
The x86_64 images are more intended for DVD media, but brave souls may
get away with the extended CD formats :-)
Thanks for your testing help!
Jeremy
17 years
usb printer again not printing, not all cd drives show up, and nautilus starts up upon rebooting
by Antonio Olivares
I have just updated the desktop * the one that did not
get the updates and the usb printer is not printing *
[olivares@localhost ~]$ uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23
22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
[olivares@localhost ~]$
part of dmesg follows
BUG: warning at kernel/softirq.c:138/local_bh_enable()
(Not tainted)
[<c042b0cf>] local_bh_enable+0x45/0x92
[<c06002bd>] cond_resched_softirq+0x2c/0x42
[<c059adf3>] release_sock+0x4f/0x9d
[<c05c670d>] tcp_sendmsg+0x90b/0x9f9
[<c05dec95>] inet_sendmsg+0x3b/0x45
[<c0599180>] sock_sendmsg+0xd0/0xeb
[<c0600901>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x4b/0x52
[<c048652a>] touch_atime+0x95/0xbb
[<c0436e71>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
[<c045bfe3>] generic_file_aio_read+0x173/0x1a4
[<c0599a44>] sys_sendto+0x118/0x138
[<c04599bf>] find_get_page+0x18/0x38
[<c045bce2>] filemap_nopage+0x18b/0x319
[<c04647b8>] __handle_mm_fault+0x362/0x8f3
[<c0599a9b>] sys_send+0x37/0x3b
[<c059a406>] sys_socketcall+0x14a/0x261
[<c0404f70>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
=======================
usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and
address 11
usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -62
usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -62
.....
etc
Another thing that I have not mentioned is that
nautilus always starts up at the beginning. I see a
file nautilus-debug-log.txt in the home directory.
[olivares@localhost ~]$ cat nautilus-debug-log.txt
===== BEGIN MILESTONES =====
0x9426098 2007/05/24 13:04:28.5903 (GLog):
"nautilus-directory.c: directories" hash table still
has 1 element at quit time (keys above)
0x9461258 2007/05/24 13:04:28.6314 (USER): debug log
dumped due to signal 11
===== END MILESTONES =====
===== BEGIN RING BUFFER =====
0x9426098 2007/05/24 13:04:28.5903 (GLog):
"nautilus-directory.c: directories" hash table still
has 1 element at quit time (keys above)
0x9461258 2007/05/24 13:04:28.6314 (USER): debug log
dumped due to signal 11
===== END RING BUFFER =====
This configuration for the debug log can be re-created
by putting the following in ~/nautilus-debug-log.conf
(use ';' to separate domain names):
[debug log]
max lines=1000
[olivares@localhost ~]$
How do I fix this? In the Laptop also running
RAWHIDE, upon fixing GNOME, I do not get this
behavior.
Again the other cd drive does not show up, if I remove
the cd in there.
[olivares@localhost ~]$ cdrecord -scanbus
scsibus0:
0,0,0 0) 'ATA ' 'MAXTOR STM332062'
'3.AA' Disk
0,1,0 1) *
0,2,0 2) *
0,3,0 3) *
0,4,0 4) *
0,5,0 5) *
0,6,0 6) *
0,7,0 7) *
scsibus1:
1,0,0 100) 'TSSTcorp' 'CD/DVDW SH-S182D'
'SB03' Removable CD-ROM
1,1,0 101) *
1,2,0 102) *
1,3,0 103) *
1,4,0 104) *
1,5,0 105) *
1,6,0 106) *
1,7,0 107) *
[olivares@localhost ~]$
Regards,
Antonio
____________________________________________________________________________________You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html
17 years
no updates shown by pup and yum, still problems with usb printer
by Antonio Olivares
Dear list,
In the morning I ran yum update -y on my desktop pc
and I got kernel-2.6.21-1.3190 and the updates listed
3194. On the laptop I got 3194 and it got glibc
updates and the ones that were released today.
Bu on the desktop it returns
[root@localhost ~]# yum update -y
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-2.6.21-1.3167.fc7
kernel-2.6.21-1.3190.fc7
kernel-2.6.21-1.3189.fc7
kernel-devel-2.6.21-1.3167.fc7
kernel-2.6.21-1.3175.fc7
kernel-devel-2.6.21-1.3190.fc7
kernel-devel-2.6.21-1.3189.fc7
kernel-devel-2.6.21-1.3175.fc7
kernel-headers-2.6.21-1.3190.fc7
[root@localhost ~]#
and the usb printer still returns device not ready
BUG: warning at kernel/softirq.c:138/local_bh_enable()
(Not tainted)
[<c042b2ef>] local_bh_enable+0x45/0x92
[<c06036b7>] cond_resched_softirq+0x2c/0x42
[<c059d5d0>] release_sock+0x54/0xa3
[<c05c9428>] tcp_sendmsg+0x91b/0xa0c
[<c05e1bb9>] inet_sendmsg+0x3b/0x45
[<c059b992>] sock_sendmsg+0xd0/0xeb
[<c0603d10>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x4b/0x52
[<c0487379>] touch_atime+0x95/0xbc
[<c0437265>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
[<c045c765>] generic_file_aio_read+0x173/0x1a6
[<c059c25c>] sys_sendto+0x11b/0x13b
[<c0604b74>] _read_unlock_irq+0x5/0x7
[<c045a150>] find_get_page+0x36/0x3b
[<c045c464>] filemap_nopage+0x18b/0x319
[<c04655a1>] __handle_mm_fault+0x8d9/0x8fb
[<c059c2b3>] sys_send+0x37/0x3b
[<c059cc21>] sys_socketcall+0x14a/0x261
[<c0404f70>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
=======================
usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and
address 11
usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -62
usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -62
usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and
address 12
Thanks,
Antonio
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
17 years
URGENT - need installable Rawhide from 5/24 (or 5/25)
by Ian Pilcher
Sorry to be a bit shrill, but I *really* would like to test whether
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151653
is actually fixed before F7 ships.
I've checked 15 or so mirrors, and none of them has yesterday's or
today's Rawhide (including the installation kernel/initrd).
If anyone knows of a current mirror, *please* let me know.
Thanks!
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno(a)gmail.com
========================================================================
17 years
Weird fsck
by Jim Bevier
Yesterday while booting up a new OS (Athlon 64 X2 kernel 2.6.21-1.3189.fc7),
the root ext3 partition had been mounted 20 time and the system said a check
was required. It failed with an uncorrectable error. I tried it again and
again it failed and dropped me into a shell prompt. I know there should not
be any error. So, I booted into FC6 which ran the check on the partition
when booting.. It passed OK. Rebooting into FC7 booted up OK. Is this
some sort of voodoo magic or is there some reason for this weird fsck
error???
Jim
17 years
Thank You Jesse Keating
by G.Wolfe Woodbury
Just know that your efforts tonight are appreciated!
I'm fetching the i386 version now and will test it tomorrow.
--
Wolfe
17 years
Re: libkeyutils.so not found
by Gianluca Cecchi
On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:19:24 +0200 Manfred Gruber wrote:
>hi !
> i have downloaded from:
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/x86_6...
> installed it by hand with rpm, and then i was possible to run yum.
ok. this solved all the problems.
I thought the fc6 rpms to be there by mistake and so i tried to clean.....
Instead it seems correct to have .fc6 packages in fc7.... Was this the
case also in the past versions?
But the worse thing is: how could I "rpm -e" a package that broke 4
services + yum + Xorg start, without any warning / preventing
message.....?????
17 years
DVD content
by Adam Pribyl
I noticed the complete DVD of F7 is smaller than DVD for FC6. This I do
not understand when the Core was merged with Extras, how that comes that
DVD is smaller? Are there all packages from Core and Extras
or it's only some subset? What is the selection criteria now when extras
are gone?
Adam Pribyl
17 years
