On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:22:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 23:11 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to napisał:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:05:52 +0200, Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com wrote:
Of course it will be the best solution. But I doubt it will happen in a next few weeks - so some temporary workaround for F15 would be appreciated. It seems to me that this is a too serious problem to release F15 without fixing/workarounding it somehow.
tempfs is backed by swap, so this shouldn't be that big of a deal.
I filled free space on /run and I was not able to start services. So I guess that it might be a problem on some systems. ()
I was thinking of the case where it was spilt into two. You are correct, the current situation isn't good.
Local users have other ways to try to kill system performance.
Yes, but it is not about performance - IMO in some cases it may be qualified as local DoS.
You are right, I was thinking of where there was a separate tmpfs for the /run/user directory and there could be a lot of memory pressure, but system services would still be able to run.