On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Mads Kiilerich
<mads(a)kiilerich.com> wrote:
> Scott Robbins wrote, On 11/16/2008 05:18 PM:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 64 bit machine or Flash 9?
>>>
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10preview/en_US/What_is_the_...
>>>
>>
>> I just looked at the release notes, and it's really quite unclear.
>> "If you are using Flash 10, you do not need libflashsupport anymore as
>> the usage of ALSA has been fixed in this version.
>> "Users of Fedora x86_64 must install the nspluginwrapper.i386 package to
>> enable the 32-bit Adobe Flash Player plug-in in Firefox, and the
>> libflashsupport.i386 package to enable sound from the plugin."
>> ^^^^^^^^
>>
>> So, is it needed or not?
>
> I thought it was clear but hard to read: That libflashsupport isn't
> "generally" (ie on i386) needed, but on 64-bit it is however still needed.
NO, its *NOT* needed.
Tell that to my system. :-) On my F10 x86_64 system, audio does not work
without it. I know what the docs say but...
The problem for me is I am not sure what to file a bug against. Suggestions?
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdiehl(a)rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123(a)rogueind.com