Re: Fedora 16 updates-testing report

[Eric Blake]

On 10/06/2011 03:23 PM, updates(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
>  The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
>
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13748
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13492
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13426
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13623
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13895
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13893
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13825
>       https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13832 
While I appreciate the fact that somebody tweaked things so that there 
are no longer links that suffer from line length problems due to bundled 
packages (thinking specifically of gnome bundling), I think this new 
output is worse than the old style that included a package name.  That's 
because now I have to click on multiple links to find out which 
package(s) I might want to leave karma on - in other words, you are 
presenting less information than previously.

Can the script that generates this email please be updated to list both 
the FEDORA-... tag of the build as a link, and at least one package name 
from the list of packages covered by that build tag, so that these lists 
will still be useful from email without having to open my browser?

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake(a)redhat.com    [phone]
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org