On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 20:40 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On mán 16.des 2013 20:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> How does that sound? Seems like something we can just get done already.
It sounds like a bad plan revoke the QA group previously occupied and
manage by RH staff only and I'm strongly against that.
So why are you planning to revert what we already had decide we did not
What's your end game with this move?
"Let QA people have fedorapeople.org
space", basically. danofsatx is the
latest, but there've been three or four people recently who started
contributing to QA and then found they wanted one of the things in
Fedora you can get by being a member of a FAS group.
Even though we don't really have a lot of use for the FAS group, Fedora
as a whole is set up such that 'being a member of a FAS group' is a bar
to entry for some things, so it seems like we're putting ourselves at a
disadvantage by not putting our members in our FAS group.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net